NFL: Chiefs a Dynasty If They Win SB 57?

[Unholy Diver]

What about really, really, really far?

After the most recent results I'm not sure what to think anymore

 

[Hockeyholic]

Beat SF pretty good.

Mahomes MVP favorite as more passing TD's than Allen (Great QB. Not on Mahomes level).

Will likely have a cakewalk to the conference title game. (Note: Buffalo is only threat. No other legit AFC contenders out there).

My prediction is becoming more and more realistic each week.

 

[GKJ]

Beat SF pretty good.

Mahomes MVP favorite as more passing TD's than Allen (Great QB. Not on Mahomes level).

Will likely have a cakewalk to the conference title game. (Note: Buffalo is only threat. No other legit AFC contenders out there).

My prediction is becoming more and more realistic each week.

No it’s not, because the NFL is a week-to-week league. I mean, I’m pretty sure you said something about already moving on to the super bowl right before the Bengals came back down 21-3 in the AFC Championship Game, sometimes even week-to-week is generous. One year ago today the Chiefs lost 27-3 to the Titans and people were calling them cooked. A year ago next week, the Bengals lost to the Jets. No one has ever won a championship in Week 7, the tides in the NFL change all the time.

 

[Voight]

Beat SF pretty good.

Mahomes MVP favorite as more passing TD's than Allen (Great QB. Not on Mahomes level).

Will likely have a cakewalk to the conference title game. (Note: Buffalo is only threat. No other legit AFC contenders out there).

My prediction is becoming more and more realistic each week.

Still won't be a dynasty.

 

[Blackhawkswincup]

I would say yes given dominance and how its hard to build dynasties in traditional sense

Last 5 years

Won SB
Lost Conf Champ
Lost SB
Won SB
Lost Conf Champ

The dominant power in AFC

 

[John Price]

no

patrick said it himself

 

[GKJ]

I would say yes given dominance and how its hard to build dynasties in traditional sense

Last 5 years

Won SB
Lost Conf Champ
Lost SB
Won SB
Lost Conf Champ

The dominant power in AFC

AFC dynasty, that was already on lock. NFL dynasty, gotta win 3.

They will though in all likelihood.

 

[CokenoPepsi]

if they win next years Super Bowl...maybe you can consider them a dynasty....i Dunno.

 

[Voight]

Even if they win next year... don't you have to win 3 of 4 for dynasty status?

 

[GKJ]

Even if they win next year... don't you have to win 3 of 4 for dynasty status?

3 of 5 is close enough.

Terminology aside, they’re clearly the class of the NFL, and they’ve responded anytime people insinuate that someone else has claim to that. Not much more to ask for.

 

[Bocephus86]

3 of 5 is close enough.

Terminology aside, they’re clearly the class of the NFL, and they’ve responded anytime people insinuate that someone else has claim to that. Not much more to ask for.

Agreed here, especially with the other seasons ending in the AFC championship or Superbowl, not like they missed the playoffs or ducked out in the first round.

Not a dynasty yet, but damn close and a run that will be talked about either way.

 

[No Fun Shogun]

I've always stood by 3 in 5 being the loosest definition of a dynasty (or 4 in 7 or 5 in 9, etc.). Three titles in a timespan where you were better than the entire rest of the league combined.

And yes, that means I don't consider the 2010-15 Blackhawks as a dynasty. The Hawks board did coin that period as a "sovereignty" as term for an "almost dynasty."

 

[TheAngryHank]

We won't have to hear talk from Mahomes for president if T Hill is the GOAT WR seeing how he is in Miami.

 

[NewtJorden]

Not yet. If they had beaten Tampa two years ago, they could be. Maybe if they win next year.