The Panther
Registered User
I am wondering if anyone can speak to this. (I guess no one on the forum watched hockey prior to the 1940s, but you never know.)
I read in a thread about historical players' evaluation of then-contemporary and other historical players that many of the 1920s and maybe early-1930s'-era players seemed to think that the c.WWII-to-early-1950s' NHL was not as 'good' as their own.
Now, of course it could just have been the usual old-men-yelling-at-the-sky thing, but the point seemed to be that the 1920s/30s' NHL was more systematic and structured, whereas the 1940s-to-1950s' NHL was more wild and disorganized.
In short, is there any truth to this? Was there a large change in style just before or during WWII, freeing up players?
I read in a thread about historical players' evaluation of then-contemporary and other historical players that many of the 1920s and maybe early-1930s'-era players seemed to think that the c.WWII-to-early-1950s' NHL was not as 'good' as their own.
Now, of course it could just have been the usual old-men-yelling-at-the-sky thing, but the point seemed to be that the 1920s/30s' NHL was more systematic and structured, whereas the 1940s-to-1950s' NHL was more wild and disorganized.
In short, is there any truth to this? Was there a large change in style just before or during WWII, freeing up players?