Well im not paying more than a 2nd for a guy who has less than 100 games under his belt with a 3 GAA in the nhl and a 35-31 W-L record
Proposal: Cgy-NYR
- Thread starter IGGY2JOHNNY
- Start date
Well im not paying more than a 2nd for a guy who has less than 100 games under his belt with a 3 GAA in the nhl and a 35-31 W-L record
Flames Fanatic
Mediocre
Out of all the goalies on the market, I'd rather just retain a UFA than pay this price for a guy who isn't a proven starter. Just my stance on it.
- Jul 28, 2011
- 15,129
- 9,918
Does it even matter that Kylington is a Seattle risk? The offer here is a 2nd along with Kylington. If Kylington impresses, well then we'll be forced to make a decision on DeAngelo. If Kylington doesn't take a stride forward, then we got a second and Seattle might not even take him, and if they choose Kylington, at least we're not losing somebody else.
This isn't one of those offers where we spent a ton of assets for a player who needs to be protected. This is a trade where we ship out a goalie who probably wouldn't be on the team longer another year anyway, and we get back a 2nd along with a player.
Either way, I can't see Flames spending that much.
Last edited:
- Sep 1, 2010
- 9,804
- 7,683
All true, thanks
I prefer a pre-waivers F prospect, NYR pipeline is thinner there
GAGLine
Registered User
- Sep 17, 2007
- 23,493
- 19,464
Fine.
No one putting a gun to anybody's head.
We are responding, btw, to the OP suggested include of Geo.
Flames Fanatic
Mediocre
That's... fine?
I'm allowed to make my own comments, nor was I offensive towards the Rangers in this either. Just saying I'd prefer not to pay that level of price?
Yeah, that's fine. No one is insulting you, I'm accepting your counter that
you don't want to pay market for Geo
and we think someone will, and that's that about that.
I'm not indignant you don't want that price, and you are not rejecting my assessment.
And vice versa.
Please. There is enuf needless conflict in the world.
We good.
peace out
bern
Lindberg Cheese
Registered User
treple13
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2013
- 2,821
- 1,504
To me, the Flames should just sign someone available. If it's not a better goalie, Talbot is fine.
Paying the price to gamble that Georgiev does better than Talbot is crazy to me.
Like at that point, rather just overpay a goalie short term to get them here
Paying the price to gamble that Georgiev does better than Talbot is crazy to me.
Like at that point, rather just overpay a goalie short term to get them here
I realized that later, forgot to correct it, he also has a 3 GAA with a 35W-31L record, he's not worth this price. One or the other, or I'll hang up with ease.
