Prospect Info: CBJ Prospect Thread XI

NotTooWideArena

Registered User
May 20, 2021
160
181
Just for laughs, here's the Google Translate rendering of the tweet from Liga:

"Ville Keskinen watches the warm-up of Tappara's final match with a keen eye, wearing a fan shirt. It says Keskinen on the back, of course. Father and son have developed a funny habit after the warm-up. The two throw "air flaps" before Oiva leaves the dressing room. 👊

"Oiva Keskinen joined Tappara's standard lineup as a credit center. There have been bumps on the way to the League, when health problems appeared in the C-junior age. Father Ville Keskinen tells how Oiva became a top player. 💪"

I swear, if I ever have too much time on my hands I will almost certainly take up the study of Finnish. (Google translate has its uses, but we should never mistake its output for an actual translation.)
 

koteka

Registered User
Jan 1, 2017
3,930
4,264
Central Ohio
Pinelli's pick was the point in last year's draft where I felt they really lost me. Their 3rd forward in a row that was 5'9. And not a lot of production for that size and no special qualities like Brindley has.

3 picks later the Red Wings took a 6’3” left D who scouts say is really good at disrupting zone entries and has a booming shot. You know what we could use in our pipeline a lot more than another smallish wing?
 

Xoggz22

Registered User
Mar 4, 2002
7,489
2,757
Columbus, Ohio
I don't disagree with you all on some of the concerns. I will only add that once beyond round 1 and 2, it becomes a question of absolute upside and dart throws. I would actually argue more against the Strathmann pick than the Pinelli pick. I don't see a high upside with Strathman and to add a defenseman that is under 6' with no real upside... seems like an AHL pick. I prefer the risk of taking Pinelli than Strathmann at that point. Once the 3rd round hits (unless truly a deep deep draft), I advocate for high upside, higher risk players or an overager. Like, I love the Keskinen pick. Here's a kid that's a year older but actually adds to the center depth with some size and skill and has a higher upside. I also like the Peddle pick in the 7th. There's your dart throw. If he ever put it together, he's got a real interesting skill set with his size, skill and demeanor. He doesn't seem like it's going to happen but certainly worth it in the 7th (or go overseas like we've done in prior drafts).
 

Cowumbus

Registered User
Mar 1, 2014
11,651
6,436
Arena District - Columbus
I don't disagree with you all on some of the concerns. I will only add that once beyond round 1 and 2, it becomes a question of absolute upside and dart throws. I would actually argue more against the Strathmann pick than the Pinelli pick. I don't see a high upside with Strathman and to add a defenseman that is under 6' with no real upside... seems like an AHL pick. I prefer the risk of taking Pinelli than Strathmann at that point. Once the 3rd round hits (unless truly a deep deep draft), I advocate for high upside, higher risk players or an overager. Like, I love the Keskinen pick. Here's a kid that's a year older but actually adds to the center depth with some size and skill and has a higher upside. I also like the Peddle pick in the 7th. There's your dart throw. If he ever put it together, he's got a real interesting skill set with his size, skill and demeanor. He doesn't seem like it's going to happen but certainly worth it in the 7th (or go overseas like we've done in prior drafts).
When I watched Peddle in person he looked like he couldn’t handle the puck any better than guys on my beer league team. This was last year of course, haven’t seen him this season. Definitely a long shot. But who knows, Rempe is on a playoff roster rn.
 

Xoggz22

Registered User
Mar 4, 2002
7,489
2,757
Columbus, Ohio
When I watched Peddle in person he looked like he couldn’t handle the puck any better than guys on my beer league team. This was last year of course, haven’t seen him this season. Definitely a long shot. But who knows, Rempe is on a playoff roster rn.
I paid attention to him in development camp and thought he was pretty good. I watched some of his play this year and the trade seemed to be a big push for him. As to Rempe... I think he's a flash in the pan and not long for the league. I may be on an island with that one but I just don't see much beyond his willingness to fight. The few games I've seen he doesn't look like a good skater to me and seems to be focused on just stirring shit up. Time will tell in both regards.
 

thebus88

19/20 Columbus Blue Jackets: "It Is What It Is"
Sep 27, 2017
5,074
2,700
Michigan
The other day we were talking about the big forwards popping in the playoffs.

Adam Lowry was a third rounder, Dakota Joshua a 5th, Rempe a 6th. Sometimes even the big guys you draft for depth end up making a bigger impact than expected.
Yep, added value for sure. Looking at our bigger guys doesn’t instill confidence. Dolzhenkov probably our best chance?
That’s 3 guys out of 16 teams. The list of later drafted “small forwards who popped in the playoffs” I’m sure is similar.

Where does Brad Marchand fit into all this?

Physical size literally has nothing to do with anything or any added value. Crosby and McDavid aren’t better players if they’re 6 foot 4. It’s all about HOW you play the game.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,699
29,399
I don't disagree with you all on some of the concerns. I will only add that once beyond round 1 and 2, it becomes a question of absolute upside and dart throws. I would actually argue more against the Strathmann pick than the Pinelli pick. I don't see a high upside with Strathman and to add a defenseman that is under 6' with no real upside... seems like an AHL pick. I prefer the risk of taking Pinelli than Strathmann at that point. Once the 3rd round hits (unless truly a deep deep draft), I advocate for high upside, higher risk players or an overager. Like, I love the Keskinen pick. Here's a kid that's a year older but actually adds to the center depth with some size and skill and has a higher upside. I also like the Peddle pick in the 7th. There's your dart throw. If he ever put it together, he's got a real interesting skill set with his size, skill and demeanor. He doesn't seem like it's going to happen but certainly worth it in the 7th (or go overseas like we've done in prior drafts).

I don't know much about Strathmann but at 5'11 187 that's a different category, that's Makar/Fox size.

That’s 3 guys out of 16 teams.

It's actually 3 off the top of my head. We could come up with a longer list if we tried.

The list of later drafted “small forwards who popped in the playoffs” I’m sure is similar.

It's not. Though ultra thick guys like Marchand and Marchessault have done well. If you have a 5'9 kid that you think will get incredibly built then go for it. I have no complaints with the Malatesta or Danforth additions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoeBartoli

Cowumbus

Registered User
Mar 1, 2014
11,651
6,436
Arena District - Columbus
That’s 3 guys out of 16 teams. The list of later drafted “small forwards who popped in the playoffs” I’m sure is similar.
It’s just an example man.
Where does Brad Marchand fit into all this?
Wherever you want him to.
Physical size literally has nothing to do with anything or any added value. Crosby and McDavid aren’t better players if they’re 6 foot 4. It’s all about HOW you play the game.
It actually does matter.

If Nick Blankenburg was 6’2” it would change everything.

There were a total of 30 players 5’9” or smaller who played over 25 games this year. Less than 1 a team..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LJ7

tunnelvision

Registered User
Jul 31, 2021
2,606
2,792
Kind of a rough game in some ways for Mateychuk and the Warriors on a b2b night as Blades evened the series 1-1 with an OT win. Well deserved loss after that many unclean passes, puck fumbles under pressure and a terrible PP.
 

CBJx614

Registered User
May 25, 2012
14,898
6,515
C-137
Oiva Keskinen looked good in Liiga playoffs. Smart center with good skating and good hands. Very good player for a 7th rounder.
These are the kinds of picks we've been missing. If he can translate his game to the NHL and make an impact that is. We've had some late picks but, but nothing more than a depth/tweener with Gavi being the exception... eventually we have to hit on one of these late right picks developing into a star.....

.....right?!
 

cbjthrowaway

Registered User
Jul 4, 2020
1,856
3,295
That’s 3 guys out of 16 teams. The list of later drafted “small forwards who popped in the playoffs” I’m sure is similar.
an incomplete but absurdly impressive list of small forwards drafted in the mid/late rounds (or undrafted):
  • johnny gaudreau
  • brayden point
  • nikita kucherov
  • jake guentzel
  • jonathan marchessault
  • cam atkinson
  • vincent trocheck
  • conor garland
  • andrew mangiapane
  • tyler johnson
  • brendan gallagher
  • mats zuccarello
  • yanni gourde
  • viktor arvidsson
  • conor sheary
  • kevin fiala
to your point, that list includes a bunch of former cup winners (tampa was really ahead of the curve on valuing smaller guys), an art ross winner, the reigning conn smythe winner, etc.

i'd take any of those guys over matt rempe, who plays 5 minutes a night.

Pinelli's pick was the point in last year's draft where I felt they really lost me. Their 3rd forward in a row that was 5'9. And not a lot of production for that size and no special qualities like Brindley has.
comparing pinelli to brindley is a fool's errand seeing as brindley was an early second round pick and pinelli was still on the board at #114. you should compare him to the players taken after that pick, and no one really jumps out there.

once you get out of the first round (or maybe the early second) you don't draft to fill specific positions in the pipeline, you draft the player on your board you think has the best chance of playing NHL games. pinelli seems like a good bet for that.

GL3ae-jWEAAcFBG

GLYbYozWYAAXmza


again, the reigning conn smythe winner was also a 5'9 winger (marchessault) who wasn't a highly rated draft prospect. pinelli's age 17 and 18 seasons in the OHL (145p in 135gp) were far more productive than marchessault's in the high-scoring QMJHL (124p in 130gp)

the production is good, plus he plays with a lot of energy and wears the C. there's plenty to like with pinelli for a fourth round pick. even with a lot of wingers in the system, there's nothing wrong with adding someone who could turn into a garland/gourde type.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,699
29,399
comparing pinelli to brindley is a fool's errand seeing as brindley was an early second round pick and pinelli was still on the board at #114. you should compare him to the players taken after that pick, and no one really jumps out there.

once you get out of the first round (or maybe the early second) you don't draft to fill specific positions in the pipeline, you draft the player on your board you think has the best chance of playing NHL games. pinelli seems like a good bet for that.

GL3ae-jWEAAcFBG

GLYbYozWYAAXmza


again, the reigning conn smythe winner was also a 5'9 winger (marchessault) who wasn't a highly rated draft prospect. pinelli's age 17 and 18 seasons in the OHL (145p in 135gp) were far more productive than marchessault's in the high-scoring QMJHL (124p in 130gp)

the production is good, plus he plays with a lot of energy and wears the C. there's plenty to like with pinelli for a fourth round pick. even with a lot of wingers in the system, there's nothing wrong with adding someone who could turn into a garland/gourde type.

I wouldn't object to a Garland type or a Gourde type or a Marchessault type, I just didn't see much chance of that when I watched Pinelli. Those players either have impressive builds or very impressive skating or insane squirmy skills, and I don't see any of that with Pinelli.

I couldn't tell you who to pick at #114, I don't do a lot of deep draft watching these days. But it's often a good range to get quality defensemen. I had my eye on Legault. Minnetian and Dionicio are good. I don't know more than one or two other players that deep in the draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tunnelvision

tunnelvision

Registered User
Jul 31, 2021
2,606
2,792
MJ wins game 3 with a 3-1 score. Goal and assist for Mateychuk, Rysavy with the GWG. Another super tight defensive battle between these clubs, feels like an ideal environment for prospects to develop in. Mateychuk's limitations with puckhandling and defensive game are getting exposed at times but he's still been one of the best players in each game imo.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad