That's nonsense. I never said Krueger would insist on playing Mitts as a 2C.
Well apparently I wasn't the only one who interpreted your post that way.
That's nonsense. I never said Krueger would insist on playing Mitts as a 2C.
I've always said it's about the evaluation process.Well apparently I wasn't the only one who interpreted your post that way.
I've always said it's about the evaluation process.
I could have worded as Mittelstadt is a candidate to play 2C and Krueger using methods that are only available in preseason to evaluate him.
He can't play center in the NHL. He wasn't even playing center in his one year of college hockey. He's too weak and he's slow-ish, not real slow but he can't get put any distance between himself and whoever is chasing him. The question is do you send him to Rochester to develop as a center or move him to the wing.
He's really reminding me of Cody Hodgson more and more and that ain't good.
Not at all because the way this team is built down the center we need him to get good and get good fast. We are wasting years trying to develop him at center in an environment not quite suitable to do so.Is it wrong to say that he might be the biggest factor in us making the playoffs or not?
Rushing him to the NHL in a counterintuitive measure to save face for one of the worst trades in franchise history. Casey is getting a lot of flack for a variety of reasons, not all of which are necessarily his fault. That's not to say he has delivered in any role his been placed in outside of his initial call-up over a year ago.What is interesting is at the draft Casey was touted as one of the if not the most skilled player in the draft.
What are the sabres doing here?
Mitts didn’t start here last season to save face. That narrative grew in the 2nd half of the season when we spiraled down and the Blues surged up. A kind of retrofitted idea. What face saving needed to be done at the time Mitts was kept to start the year? Even after the season started, up until almost the half way point, we were one of the best teams in the NHL and the Blues were at the bottom.Rushing him to the NHL in a counterintuitive measure to save face for one of the worst trades in franchise history. Casey is getting a lot of flack for a variety of reasons, not all of which are necessarily his fault. That's not to say he has delivered in any role his been placed in outside of his initial call-up over a year ago.
What is interesting is at the draft Casey was touted as one of the if not the most skilled player in the draft.
What are the sabres doing here?
Yes he was a very highly touted prospect. Even rated as one of the top prospects around the NHL before last year. I think some had him ranked #1.Not by everyone. And skill alone will only get you so far.
Yes he was a very highly touted prospect. Even rated as one of the top prospects around the NHL before last year. I think some had him ranked #1.
Again, not by everyone. And he said “at the draft.” Plenty of folks had him outside of the top 10...including some of the folks who subsequently ranked him among The top prospects in the league...who subsequently downgraded him significantly.
People’s opinions on prospects change all the time. At the draft, the consensus for Casey was right around where we picked him, with some having him top 3, and some outside the top 10
I've never seen Mittlestadt ranked #1 in any prospect rating, ever but dont let me become destroyer of narratives because I relish in the opportunity.
"Not by everyone"Again, not by everyone. And he said “at the draft.” Plenty of folks had him outside of the top 10...including some of the folks who subsequently ranked him among The top prospects in the league...who subsequently downgraded him significantly.
People’s opinions on prospects change all the time. At the draft, the consensus for Casey was right around where we picked him, with some having him top 3, and some outside the top 10
"Not by everyone"
If you mean everyone as the entire world then no. If you mean the hockey world then yes.
You are incorrect. Look at the rankings at the time of the draft, on these boards or in any sports publication. Very few had him in the top 5, many had him outside the top 10.
Which is it, some or many had him outside the top 10?
Also, which sources had him outside the top 10?
No argument being made with my post. Just showing you that you were wrong about him not being ranked #1 anywhere."My preference is for highly skilled players with upside. I look for prospects with speed, skill and intelligence."
If I rated players only for their defensive acumen, good first pass and speed my #1 would look different, keyword being this rating is his preference (a singular preference). I mean sure you were right that someone rated him #1 but using Pronmen as your foothold to support your Mittlestadt argument rather than a general consensus is like standing on a mud hill hoping it doesn't rain.
Mitts didn’t start here last season to save face. That narrative grew in the 2nd half of the season when we spiraled down and the Blues surged up. A kind of retrofitted idea. What face saving needed to be done at the time Mitts was kept to start the year? Even after the season started, up until almost the half way point, we were one of the best teams in the NHL and the Blues were at the bottom.
Its amazing to me all the silly theories attached to Mitts.