Svechhammer
THIS is hockey?
- Jun 8, 2017
- 23,909
- 87,973
They gave up a 6th this year and a 2nd and 4th next year.
Seems like a very low risk potential high reward move.
Seems like a very low risk potential high reward move.
I don't mind taking a flyer on the kid but I just don't see the talent with him, he is still living off of hype from college where he was overrated there as well. And 2nd and 4th round picks still have lots of value, this isn't the NHL.
But I'll be rooting for him to prove me wrong.
I guess it's more of a forgone conclusion than before who the Jets are taking.
Ehh, picking at 8, I wouldn't trust any QB who would be available. I know this is supposedly a great crop of QBs, but given the recent trend of QBs just not working out even medium term with the team who drafted them, I would be leery of anyone who isn't at the absolute top of the list. And even then, I'd be a little skeptical wondering if people are only fawning because of the position and not necessarily the skill.The Panthers fan side of me thinks this is a reasonable swing to see how he does away from the tire fire.
The Patriots fan side of me is happy that this likely takes the Panthers out of grabbing a QB in the top 10 of the draft.
But we didn't spend a 1st.. it's not low cost but I'm sure the Jets wanted a 1st. and they didn't get it. also if we improve the second rounder will be worth less then current.. (Now that's an if) It's not a steal but I don't think we got fleeced either.. It was cheaper then most of the alternatives... now we do have a TB problem to deal withI don't mind taking a flyer on the kid but I just don't see the talent with him, he is still living off of hype from college where he was overrated there as well. And 2nd and 4th round picks still have lots of value, this isn't the NHL.
But I'll be rooting for him to prove me wrong.
Honestly, they'd be better off fixing the OL before they do anything drastic at QB. I would focus all energy on getting that OL solidified and it'll make any future moves they make that much more effective.The only issue with this move is that sometimes when you have a young guy who's middle of the road, it removes the urgency to actually address the position.
The Panthers need to keep trying to find an above-average NFL QB and if Darnold is not that but is serviceable, they may slow their search for one. Many, many teams have done this and continue to do this. Bridgewater is better because he may not be the answer but you know he's not the answer he's just a bridge, so you won't be tempted to change your plans to replace him.
Come on you know turnstiles are the best O lineHonestly, they'd be better off fixing the OL before they do anything drastic at QB. I would focus all energy on getting that OL solidified and it'll make any future moves they make that much more effective.
Hah, it always amuses me that teams try and do this the other way around. What better way to screw up development of talent than just allowing it to get blasted by the defense every week.Come on you know turnstiles are the best O line
Honestly, they'd be better off fixing the OL before they do anything drastic at QB. I would focus all energy on getting that OL solidified and it'll make any future moves they make that much more effective.
Burrow is supposedly lobbying for Chase.Sewell won't be available at #8, at least I'll be damn shocked if Cincinnati doesn't take him.
Burrow is supposedly lobbying for Chase.
Wait now you want to PROTECT the QB you just got why on earth would you do that? don't you want your QB being on IR most of the season?Problem here is the Bengals need to make sure their franchise QB doesn't die on the field. For that I'd take Sewell if I'm the Bengals front office.
Honestly, they'd be better off fixing the OL before they do anything drastic at QB. I would focus all energy on getting that OL solidified and it'll make any future moves they make that much more effective.