There's only a few weeks left before training camp (Sept 22). You think there is going to be a trade in the works before then? If we do sign Chara, we'll have Chara, Carlson, Orlov, Schultz, Jensen, Fehervary, TVR, Kempny.
Fever is a way better skater than Alzner was IMO.
I am still pretty confident that Kempny won't be on the opening night roster. There's your roster slot. Chara is a much better fit for the Caps skill needs than Kempny is on top of the fact that we can't even before sure that Kempny is capable of passing his physical. I also have to think Schultz or Jensen have a ticket out because if they dont they extended TvR and protected him so he could eat nachos every night.
What do you think it will cost to move him? I can't imagine anyone giving something up for him at this point. And he makes too much money to bury in the AHL and have that dead cap on us.
Im 100% in to bring Chara back. But not sure i want to offload from LD to do so. Im still prioritising a Schultz-move.
trade Kempny
TvR-Carlson
Orlov-Schultz
Chara-Jensen
Fehervary
trade Schultz
Kempny-Carlson
Orlov-TvR
Chara-Jensen
Fehervary
well, not sure. Anyways Fever is looking at playing a lot of games from that position.
wouldnt be overly suprised if they just find some cap loophole to bring Chara back without trading anyone either. They like to have depth on defence.
My two goals for the next 5 years:
895
2nd cup.
Bringing Chara back doesn't help with 895.
Does it help with the second cup? In my opinion, not really. Sure he's better than Fehervary now but I don't see us as cup contenders anyway. Long term might be better to let Fehervary have the development time.
So it's a no to Chara for me.
Not to nit pik but Fehervary is going to play. Whether second pair or third pair, he is going to play. They are certainly not going to move a right defense to left so that they can scratch the kid.
The reason to move a left defense is because they want to use Alexeyev as the spare left d in Hershey for call up when a left d game is available. Right?
Facts are they probably want to move a right d so that TvR isnt scratched. I could be way wrong but I think they want to move Kempny to make a space for Chara and Schultz or Jensen to make a spot for TvR.
Fehervary is going to play every game unless he earns a healthy scratch. Otherwise he is an every game player.
I don't know about that. There's plenty of opportunity for garbage time goals if they're bleeding out defensively. There were ample examples of that earlier on in his career. Not that it was easier per se. He was a force regardless and the new rules made it a transitional era anyway. But playing in more wide open games could at least in theory make it easier to reach 895. I don't think that's their plan but they have certainly shifted away from the Trotz/Niskanen/Orpik movement toward something a lot more risky and less stout. Part of it's the play of Carlson and never replacing Niskanen but Laviolette also prefers calculated risk over sitting back. I doubt Laviolette is around for another five seasons but between limited cap space, aging forwards, inexperienced defense and goaltending they're running the risk of becoming a team that's either high event both ways or more likely high event against. That dynamic could lead to being on the losing end and a lot of late extra attacker or generally garbage time goals for him. I don't think there's a real correlation between the two. Game management alone could provide them with late PP opportunities to get his.Also, 895 isn't going to happen if the Caps suck. We never talk about that. Either they are good or he can't get there.
Also, 895 isn't going to happen if the Caps suck. We never talk about that. Either they are good or he can't get there.
i certainly hope so, but lets let the kid earn the spot first.
The thing im a bit buzzled and why i also like trading Schultz before Kempny, especially if we would bring Chara back, who would Fever be playing with. Carlson, Schultz? Those guys arent really ideal to ”protect” the rookie. Jensen would be locked with Z. TvR might make sense but then you are back at scratching Schultz.
I don't know about that. There's plenty of opportunity for garbage time goals if they're bleeding out defensively. There were ample examples of that earlier on in his career. Not that it was easier per se. He was a force regardless and the new rules made it a transitional era anyway. But playing in more wide open games could at least in theory make it easier to reach 895. I don't think that's their plan but they have certainly shifted away from the Trotz/Niskanen/Orpik movement toward something a lot more risky and less stout. Part of it's the play of Carlson and never replacing Niskanen but Laviolette also prefers calculated risk over sitting back. I doubt Laviolette is around for another five seasons but between limited cap space, aging forwards, inexperienced defense and goaltending they're running the risk of becoming a team that's either high event both ways or more likely high event against. That dynamic could lead to being on the losing end and a lot of late extra attacker or generally garbage time goals for him. I don't think there's a real correlation between the two. Game management alone could provide them with late PP opportunities to get his.
I think the big question is whether they'd really be comfortable immediately placing Fehervary in a second-pair role, particularly alongside a player like Schultz. I don't know the answer to that other than that Kempny or Chara very likely aren't the answer either. But I do wonder under a new coach whether they might actually give Kempny a chance given his experience.
He still led the league in goals when they missed the playoffs and were a mess under Oates. Typically when they've struggled as a team it hasn't negatively impacted his productivity, confidence or pride. Time could alter that and a mess of a team could lead to his own struggles but not necessarily. Them being a strong possession team and powerhouse would be ideal but he's tended to get his rain or shine. Also I don't know that teams having the lead means the game will get locked down. Often it's just the opposite as teams sit back. More lax game situations in his favor could offset any larger team loss of confidence or something. If that were to happen over the next season or two it could also lead to a relatively high pick that could end up helping him more crucially a year or two later when he may need it.I guess we can disagree. I just see a team that has dropped from top 5 to bottom 10 in pp% and a team that struggles to score 5 on 5 and a team behind with teams locking down the defense as a poor package to score a lot of goals.
He still led the league in goals when they missed the playoffs and were a mess under Oates. Typically when they've struggled as a team it hasn't negatively impacted his productivity, confidence or pride. Time could alter that and a mess of a team could lead to his own struggles but not necessarily. Them being a strong possession team and powerhouse would be ideal but he's tended to get his rain or shine. Also I don't know that teams having the lead means the game will get locked down. Often it's just the opposite as teams sit back. More lax game situations in his favor could offset any larger team loss of confidence or something. If that were to happen over the next season or two it could also lead to a relatively high pick that could end up helping him more crucially a year or two later when he may need it.
It seems doubtful that they'll be a real powerhouse at any point in the short-term. They're more likely a middle of the pack team, maybe a bit better or maybe a bit worse if they get hit with injuries or developmental setbacks. If it's more on the losing end I tend to doubt it radically alters his pursuit. His pursuit will be his pursuit regardless and barring him losing the ability to assert himself as easily I don't think team dynamics changes much. If anything he may take it on himself more to continue to lead the way. The danger is mostly whenever he can no longer really do much on his own individually but I don't think he's there yet for a while unless there's a serious injury. He's realistically not going to have an elite center either way and while he's a lot less dynamic individually than he was I tend to think his leadership and will aren't going to waiver much regardless of the team's direction. He's always been super prideful and as long as he still can muster it I tend to think that will be there.
They did fundamentally suck 5-on-5 that year. The PP was strong but so was last year's so I'm not sure where the PP concern stems from. They can still have a good/strong PP on an otherwise poor team. Their current construction is likely that of a high event team that gives up more quality chances. If they're toward the losing end of things I don't think it negatively impacts his pursuit much unless they're a real mess. I don't think Laviolette lets that happen without a fight. Some sort of outlier Buffalo style ineptitude is remote and would come with eventual (if not fairly immediate) roster alterations. They're not going to suddenly just turn into a shit show of continual idiocy, right? As long as he gets around 35 a year for five years he'll break the mark and they'll make changes to keep that on track as needed. Realistically that can still happen in a fairly crappy team or two provided his game doesn't dramatically fall off.The year the Caps missed the playoffs under Oates, they had the #2 pp in the league. They didn't suck. They were an underperforming cup contender. I am talking about an actual bad team. He team without Mike Green and John Carlson. Ov can score 40 on a bubble team. He cant on a crappy team.
whats wrong with scratching schultz? if he's pushed out of the lineup then scratch him or trade himi certainly hope so, but lets let the kid earn the spot first.
The thing im a bit buzzled and why i also like trading Schultz before Kempny, especially if we would bring Chara back, who would Fever be playing with. Carlson, Schultz? Those guys arent really ideal to ”protect” the rookie. Jensen would be locked with Z. TvR might make sense but then you are back at scratching Schultz.
whats wrong with scratching schultz? if he's pushed out of the lineup then scratch him or trade him