Man, I know that they were both playing with heart and both went kinda unlucky.. But I have a hard time giving them pluses when they were on the ice basically for every goal against us. Harrington injured Hornqvist, was right there with that bad bounce for that 1st goal, was doing the right thing on that 3rd goal, but Fehr still scored.. Both were also getting good looks for the shots but they were blocked a lot of times...
I´m not saying that they were horrible, but they weren´t perfect either and had a lot of bad luck. Great games will come from those two, they have good habits and compete levels, but this still wasn´t a game to give them pluses. Just too much bad luck around those two..
I know, different standards.. But as I mentioned before.. we haven´t had A SINGLE SCORING CHANCE WITHOUT CROSBY TONIGHT. Not even one.. He created 5 of them and had two himself. His finish is terrible, but if at least 2 of those 5 are converted by his teammates then he wouldn´t be criticized to death for this game. He was quite unlucky too in this regard, I guess.
Malkin on the other hand generated less than half of it and is apparently getting a free pass again. Yeah, I hate it when he plays a wing but I also hate when someone plays with Kunitz and Rust.. Just a terrible coaching job by MJ tonight. Terrible. Not adjusting until 0-3 late in the game. It was frustrating.
No blueliner will ever play perfect, but the reasons you are knocking Despres and Harrington seems pretty unfair IMHO. Both of those guys played outstanding hockey last night and got zero support up front, both in terms of offense and their fwds covering their assignments.
Harrington clipping Hornqvist with the puck is just part of hockey. I can't see a reason to knock his game last night over an accident. As for those two being on the ice for all 3 goals agt, they really weren't at fault for at least two of them.
The first goal Harrington made a nice play to stop the pass, but got unlucky and it bounced into the paint and got stuffed home.
On the second goal, Despres made a smart pinch trying to generate offense in a one goal game and had numbers back. Crosby instead of going back on his heels, went at the puck carrier and took himself out of the play. Harrington then played the 2-1 well and took away the pass. That is what you are taught to do on a 2-1. You leave the shooter to the goalie.
On the third goal, Rust was well out of his zone and allowed the pass to get to the point, it was slid p-p and the shot on net was deflected. The puck landed right in the paint and Harrington put his guy on his ass, but he knocked the puck in as he fell down.
When you are looking at assignments and what went wrong, Crosby and Rust are the guys that had the mental breakdowns that lead to the last two goals. If you want to blame Harrington for the first goal, I suppose an argument can be made. It's seemed like crap luck though and not a mental breakdown.