Got them from moneypuck. I accidentally looked at 5v5 2.15 xGA (2nd) For all situations it’s 2.65 (3rd) and Caps at 1th with 2.56.
The table layout is easy to quickly look something up quickly, but the numbers are significant different. That’s not good.
Interesting results. I usually don't look at Moneypuck because I dislike their layout.
Rankings usually aren't as important than the raw numbers, but even so it looks like Moneypuck's xG model differs quite a bit with other models such as from Evolving Hockey and Natural Stat Trick. Doesn't make them any better or worse, just interesting to note that Chicago's defense looks better under Moneypuck than other teams do. I know they do a few things differently, mainly in terms of weighing "flurry shots" and other shot types differently, but neat results.
I still think I like the idea of Fleury mainly because his results have been very good over the past several years and because he has been healthy. Obviously full retention (or double retention) would be needed, and I don't want to sell the farm for him, but it is true to note that he has been quite average at best this year in Chicago.
