F A N
Registered User
- Aug 12, 2005
- 18,738
- 5,964
Simple question since the deadline to opt out is Friday. For the purpose of this thread, retirement is not an option since I assume that everyone would prefer that he retire rather than opt out. For clarity's sake, if Hamonic decides to opt out, the Canucks can either roll the contract over to next year or remove this year from his contract. I assume that if Hamonic opts out, the Canucks will remove this year from the contract. I assume that the Canucks cannot terminate his contract.
Pro
If Hamonic opts out, the Canucks get $3M in cap space this year which gives the team wiggle room to extend Petey and Hughes long term. Hamonic doesn't really move the needle anyways and his heart might not be fully into it. I don't doubt that Hamonic would be a professional if he decides to play this season but he's not good enough to play well if his heart and mind are elsewhere. With the addition of Poolman and Schenn, do we really need another defensive Dman who isn't exactly a bonafide top 4 Dman? Maybe one of our left side Dman can move over to the right side. There's also the possibility that Hamonic might simply retire if he opts out this year.
Con
If Hamonic opts out, the Canucks would be without a right side defenseman. It's a bit difficult to find a capable replacement without giving up an asset or taking on a bad contract at this point. Hamonic may not move the needle, but he does provide some depth. Absent further decline, he is a legitimate NHL defenseman who might be the best option to play top 4 minutes alongside Hughes. If Poolman is playing with OEL, you're looking at... ? to play with Hughes? Additionally, if Hamonic skips the year and then comes back, he basically tanks his value and the team will be paying $3M for a 32 year old who has missed a full year of hockey.
My take?
I honestly don't know. At this point, I think retirement is the best option but between Hamonic opting out and not opting out... maybe it's best to just move on. Deal with things later if Hamonic decides to come back next year. Try Hughes or Rathbone on the right side and go with it.
Pro
If Hamonic opts out, the Canucks get $3M in cap space this year which gives the team wiggle room to extend Petey and Hughes long term. Hamonic doesn't really move the needle anyways and his heart might not be fully into it. I don't doubt that Hamonic would be a professional if he decides to play this season but he's not good enough to play well if his heart and mind are elsewhere. With the addition of Poolman and Schenn, do we really need another defensive Dman who isn't exactly a bonafide top 4 Dman? Maybe one of our left side Dman can move over to the right side. There's also the possibility that Hamonic might simply retire if he opts out this year.
Con
If Hamonic opts out, the Canucks would be without a right side defenseman. It's a bit difficult to find a capable replacement without giving up an asset or taking on a bad contract at this point. Hamonic may not move the needle, but he does provide some depth. Absent further decline, he is a legitimate NHL defenseman who might be the best option to play top 4 minutes alongside Hughes. If Poolman is playing with OEL, you're looking at... ? to play with Hughes? Additionally, if Hamonic skips the year and then comes back, he basically tanks his value and the team will be paying $3M for a 32 year old who has missed a full year of hockey.
My take?
I honestly don't know. At this point, I think retirement is the best option but between Hamonic opting out and not opting out... maybe it's best to just move on. Deal with things later if Hamonic decides to come back next year. Try Hughes or Rathbone on the right side and go with it.