Canucks News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Some Like it Hot

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
24,309
39,401
Junktown
Here’s my spreadsheet for upcoming UFAs, each team’s cap situation, and a trade tracker. I update the spreadsheet daily. I use CapFriendly to create this list and AFP Analytics for the contract projections.

Edit: Spreadsheet has been updated with AFP's latest projections and I added a new section for RFAs.

Top-6 Forwards
Sam ReinhartRW288y/10.25m
Jake GuentzelW296y/7.94m
Steven StamkosLW/C343y/6.30m
Jonathan MarchessaultW333y/6.25m
Joe PavelskiRW391y/3.94m
Matt DucheneRW/C333y/6.46m
Sean MonahanFW293y/2.87m
Tyler ToffoliW325y/6.53m
Jonathan DrouinW294y/4.46m
Teuvo TeravainenW295y/6.13m
Vladimir TarasenkoRW323y/5.64m
Adam HenriqueLW/C342y/4.60m
Chandler StephensonC/LW305y/5.77m
Max DomiC/RW293y/4.17m
Patrick KaneRW352y/5.51m
Elias LindholmC/RW297y/8.04m
Anthony ManthaW293y/4.40m
Daniel SprongW273y/3.89m
Jake DeBruskW275y/5.92m
David PerronW362y/2.80m
Tyler BertuzziW295y/6.00m
Anthony DuclairW283y/3.22m
Jason ZuckerW323y/5.46m
Jack RoslovicC/RW273y/3.11m
Max PaciorettyLW35
Alexander BarabanovW303y/3.03m

Top-4 Defecemen
Shayne GostisbehereLD/RD313y/4.38m
Brady SkjeiLD306y/7.39m
Noah HanifinLD277y/7.69m
Brandon MontourRD307y/8.71m
Oliver Ekman-LarssonLD323y/3.67m
Dylan DeMeloRD314y/5.07m
Sean WalkerLD/RD294y/4.87m
Matt RoyRD294y/5.58m
TJ BrodieLD/RD343y/4.91m
Brenden DillonLD332y/3.91m
Alexandre CarrierRD273y/3.57m
Nikita ZadorovLD/RD294y/5.10m
Chris TanevRD343y/4.68m
Brett PesceRD296y/6.72m
Matt GrzelcykLD303y/4.07m
Oliver KylingtonLD/RD27

Bottom-6 Forwards
James van RiemsdykW351y/1.50m
Warren FoegeleW284y/3.58m
Stefan NoesenW312y/3.23m
Danton HeinenW28
Tyler JohnsonFW33
Alexander WennbergC294y/4.21m
Jordan MartinookW312y/2.79m
Dakota JoshuaLW283y/3.00m
Michael AmadioW28
Teddy BluegerC/LW292y/2.56m
Sam LaffertyFW292y/1.72m
Kiefer SherwoodW29
Mike HoffmanLW341y/1.86m
Tomas TatarW331y/2.21m
Kyle OkposoRW361y/1.96m
Kasperi KapanenRW27
Andrew CoglianoLW37
Jakob SilfverbergW332y/2.78m
Cal ClutterbuckRW36
Corey PerryRW39
Patrick MaroonW36
Yakov TreninLW/C273y/3.33m
Dominik KubalikW282y/1.34m
Anthony BeauvillierW27
Sam CarrickC/RW32
Tanner PearsonLW31
Zemgus GirgensonsLW/C302y/1.74m
Colin BlackwellC/RW31
Brandon DuhaimeW27
Nick CousinsLW/C30
Connor BrownW30
Joel KivirantaW28
William CarrierLW293y/2.68m
Tyler MotteW293y/2.55m
Samuel BlaisW281y/0.94m
Tyson JostC26

Bottom-Pairing Defencemen
Erik GustafssonLD323y/4.99m
Tyler MyersRD342y/2.67m
Justin SchultzRD332y/3.81m
Kevin ShattenkirkRD351y/1.37m
Jalen ChatfieldRD283y/2.77m
Mike ReillyLD301y/1.24m
Dmitry KulikovLD/RD33
Alec MartinezLD361y/1.7m
Tyson BarrieRD322y/3.72m
Jani HakanpaaRD322y/2.38m
Vincent DesharnaisRD282y/1.41m
Ian ColeLD/RD352y/3.09m
Matt DumbaRD293y/3.73m
Colin MillerRD31
Mark GiordanoLD401y/3.11m
Marco ScandellaLD34
Calvin De HaanLD/RD33
Josh BrownRD30
Ilya LyubushkinRD301y/1.31m
Joel EdmundsonLD/RD31
Troy StecherRD30
Derek ForbortLD32
Erik JohnsonRD361y/1.13m

Forward Depth
Christian FischerW27
Craig SmithRW34
Victor OlofssonW28
Trevor LewisRW/C37
Justin BaileyRW29
Kevin StenlundC/RW27
Jeff CarterRW/C39
Ryan CarpenterRW/C33
Nicolas Aube-KubelRW282y/1.53m
AJ GreerW27
Liam O'BrienW29
Chris TierneyC30
Mattias JanmarkW31
Sam GagnerRW/C34
Brendan SmithLD/RD35
Eric RobinsonLW29
Zach PariseLW39
Kevin LabancW282y/1.94m
Fredrik OlofssonC/LW28
Alex Barre-BouletW27
Matt MartinW35
Radim ZohornaW28
Pierre-Edouard BellemareC/LW39
Tyler PitlickRW32
Austin WatsonW32
Tomas NosekLW/C31
Jansen HarkinsLW27
Rourke ChartierC28
Steven LorentzFW28

Defensive Depth
Jack JohnsonLD37
Vincent DesharnaisRD282y/1.41m
Anthony DeangeloRD282y/1.80m
Jarred TinordiLD32
Sebastian AhoLD28
Dakota MermisLD/RD30
Jacob MacDonaldLD/RD31
Dennis GilbertLD27
Nikita ZaitsevRD32
Nick DeSimoneRD29
Travis DermottLD/RD27
Caleb JonesLD/RD27
Chad RuhwedelRD34
William LagesonLD/RD28

Goaltenders
Cam TalbotG361y/1.89m
Ilya SamsonovG272y/3.26m
Alex NedeljkovicG282y/2.00m
Kaapo KahkonenG272y/2.93m
Scott WedgewoodG312y/1.57m
Casey DeSmithG321y/2.02m
Anthony StolarzG302y/1.91m
James ReimarG36
Antti RaantaG351y/1.31m
David RittichG31
Kevin LankinenG291y/1.58m
Laurent BrossoitG312y/1.95m
Calvin PickardG32
Martin JonesG34
 
Last edited:

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
54,186
86,728
Vancouver, BC
He'll probably end up going for a 2nd and another pick given how much the Hurricanes love draft picks and the amount of 2nds that the Utah Hockey Clubs and Blackhawks have. His 71 point season last year is better than anything Bjorkstrand or Boeser were able to accomplish when they were put on the block.

That's probably about exactly what will happen.

Bjorkstrand's no-fans year he scored at a 64-point pace while leading his team in scoring by a wide margin. I don't think it was hugely different.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
24,309
39,401
Junktown
That's probably about exactly what will happen.

Bjorkstrand's no-fans year he scored at a 64-point pace while leading his team in scoring by a wide margin. I don't think it was hugely different.

I don't think smart NHL teams put a lot of value on that season. He also fit the mold of a good scorer on a bad team while Necas, last season, lead a playoff team in scoring. I think a team will convince themselves these are important differences and why he's worth more.

Hurricanes also don't make trades unless they feel they are 100% winning the trade.
 

JohnHodgson

Registered User
May 6, 2009
4,132
1,508
You guys are actually insane if you think Carolina will ship him off for a 2nd round pick.

They could literally just go to arbitration with him and have him for another year at a reasonable cost.

A contending team is not going to ship off a young top six forward for a 2nd. Cmon now, let's exercise some common sense yeah?

Using the Bjorkstrand trade just furthers the point - Columbus made a massive mistake to acquire JG and trade Bjorkstrand for peanuts in a flat cap world. The Bjorkstrand trade only happens because of the flat cap and the last minute decision by JG to sign with the Jackets - it wouldn't have happened otherwise.

Bjorkstrand trade was an anomaly (that turned out to be one of the bigger steals in the last 5 years). Why would you guys use that as a baseline?

None of what you guys said made any sense at this point.

Comparing Necas to Boeser makes no sense since Boeser was coming off a terrible season and he's slow. Necas had 71 points the year before and is a speedster.
 

JohnHodgson

Registered User
May 6, 2009
4,132
1,508
Which transactions?

They got off Dickinson. They got off Beauvillier (though no extra term) for free. Hall was supposed to be a cap dump but Boston paid nothing to move him. COL got off RyJo for a 1st, but a large part of that cost was acquiring Walker, so maybe the actual "sweetener" value was a 2nd or 3rd. When TOR had to ditch Mrazek it cost them moving down like 10 slots in the draft.

At this point, I'm not saying they'll get off Mik for free. But it won't be "a fortune".
Mikheyev's contract is twice as bad as Dickinnson's. And we had so many people here complaining about giving up a second round pick to get rid of Dickinson.

Chicago desperately needed a goalie and still got a lot of value out of picking up Mrazek. He's been great for them.

From a value/production to contract standpoint, Mikheyev is far worse than the players you are referencing as examples. It'll likely cost a late first or two seconds to dump him, which is not worth it when the org is not exactly stocked with assets.

The more I think about it, the more likely I think the team keeps him to see if he bounces back and deals him at the deadline with a pick if he continues to suck.
 

Josepho

i want the bartkowski thread back
Jan 1, 2015
14,832
8,417
British Columbia
The only hope of being able to reasonably get out of Mikheyev's deal (ie less than a 1st) is if SJ feels like adding veterans like Chicago did last offseason, but even then I don't think Mikheyev has the pedigree for any sort of mentor role that Perry/Hall/Foligno have.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
15,915
15,565
Victoria
Mikheyev's contract is twice as bad as Dickinnson's. And we had so many people here complaining about giving up a second round pick to get rid of Dickinson.

Chicago desperately needed a goalie and still got a lot of value out of picking up Mrazek. He's been great for them.

From a value/production to contract standpoint, Mikheyev is far worse than the players you are referencing as examples. It'll likely cost a late first or two seconds to dump him, which is not worth it when the org is not exactly stocked with assets.

The more I think about it, the more likely I think the team keeps him to see if he bounces back and deals him at the deadline with a pick if he continues to suck.
So what you're saying is you actually can't provide any recent examples of expensive cap dumps, and are grasping at straws to say that Mik is not analogous to any of these examples.

The cap dump pricing is going to decrease purely because the scarcity of cap space is going to decline with the rapidly increasing cap.
 
Last edited:

JohnHodgson

Registered User
May 6, 2009
4,132
1,508
So what you're saying is you actually can't provide any recent examples of expensive cap dumps, and are grasping at straws to say that Mik in not analogous to any of these examples.

The cap dump pricing is going to decrease purely because the scarcity of cap space is going to decline with the rapidly increasing cap.
I literally just provided an example for Dickinson. What are you talking about bud lol?

Dickinson's deal is half the price as Mikheyev and cost a second round pick to dump. It's going to cost double that price or a late first round pick.

Paying that price to dump off Mikheyev when he can still be an effective top nine forward is a "fortune" to me.

The examples you're bringing up don't make any sense. Beauvillier didn't have any term left and was just a stop-gap. They also traded him at the deadline to Nashville so they basically just rented him for free.

Hall is a legit top six forward who just came off a great playoffs with 8 points in 7 games. Mrazek filled a position of need for Chicago and has been great for them so far.

None of "your examples" that you provided are even close to the reality of Mikheyev's situation.

Avalanche gave up a first round pick to get a 3rd pairing depth defenseman and to dump RyJo. That sounds pretty darn expensive to me.

Cap going up is not going to change the prices - that's not how it works at all. Players will ask for more money and UFA's will get paid more - that will eat up the available cap space. Dumping players will still cost a lot.
 

JohnHodgson

Registered User
May 6, 2009
4,132
1,508
The only hope of being able to reasonably get out of Mikheyev's deal (ie less than a 1st) is if SJ feels like adding veterans like Chicago did last offseason, but even then I don't think Mikheyev has the pedigree for any sort of mentor role that Perry/Hall/Foligno have.

This is bang on.

It's like Canucks fans think the rest of league wasn't paying attention since Christmas. Mikheyev might be washed at this point. There would be little to no value in bringing in someone like him from a rebuilding standpoint - in fact he would just be blocking a roster spot and opportunity for a young player to play.

Guys like Hall/Foligno/Perry brought leadership, production, and pedigree to the team. MIkheyev is not going to provide any of these at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baby Pettersson

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
15,915
15,565
Victoria
I literally just provided an example for Dickinson. What are you talking about bud lol?

Dickinson's deal is half the price as Mikheyev and cost a second round pick to dump. It's going to cost double that price or a late first round pick.

Paying that price to dump off Mikheyev when he can still be an effective top nine forward is a "fortune" to me.

The examples you're bringing up don't make any sense. Beauvillier didn't have any term left and was just a stop-gap. They also traded him at the deadline to Nashville so they basically just rented him for free.

Hall is a legit top six forward who just came off a great playoffs with 8 points in 7 games. Mrazek filled a position of need for Chicago and has been great for them so far.

None of "your examples" that you provided are even close to the reality of Mikheyev's situation.

Avalanche gave up a first round pick to get a 3rd pairing depth defenseman and to dump RyJo. That sounds pretty darn expensive to me.

Cap going up is not going to change the prices - that's not how it works at all. Players will ask for more money and UFA's will get paid more - that will eat up the available cap space. Dumping players will still cost a lot.
I already mentioned Dickinson as a player they got off of in short order. Now you're trying to retcon that was your example, lmao. He was horrible in Vancouver and everyone knew that. Wasn't impossible to dump.

Yes, cap going up will affect prices. It's supply and demand. There is going to be an artificially induced increase in the supply of cap space. Therefore, the value of buying cap space will decrease. We've already seen the prices of the most recent cap dumps be less than what we've seen in the past (e.g. Marleau, Marc Staal, etc.).

And once again, you have not provided any novel, recent examples.
 

Diversification

Registered User
Jun 21, 2019
3,086
3,859
The only hope of being able to reasonably get out of Mikheyev's deal (ie less than a 1st) is if SJ feels like adding veterans like Chicago did last offseason, but even then I don't think Mikheyev has the pedigree for any sort of mentor role that Perry/Hall/Foligno have.
The other way it might play out is in an offseason change of scenery type trade - money in money out. But those are tougher to pull off. Would have to be returning a player that suits our needs while the other side needs a speedy winger with a defensive conscience.

But the list of players with matching contracts is not appealing (Chiarot, Gudbransen, Murphy) or not realistic (Tuch, Backlund).

The only player I could find that might be suitable (but not really) is JG Pageau.
 

TruGr1t

Proper Villain
Jun 26, 2003
23,700
7,869
I now think you prioritize keeping Lindholm and Zadorov, and then work from there. Need to ditch salary to do it, and probably lose Joshua and Hronek.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lawrence

JohnHodgson

Registered User
May 6, 2009
4,132
1,508
I now think you prioritize keeping Lindholm and Zadorov, and then work from there. Need to ditch salary to do it, and probably lose Joshua and Hronek.
Servalli said that Zadorov thinks he can get 6 x 6 in the offseason.

That would be too much for my taste.

I hope the management team keeps a flexible outlook instead of a "keep someone at all costs" approach.

Zadorov has been great for us but we also need to be able to walk away if the price gets too crazy.

With that said, I feel like they have to keep Dakota Joshua because he won't be that expensive on an annual average basis, but he's a big body that's great on the PK and the forecheck. He's a bottom six guy who's never had any contractual stability. We can easily offer a 3.5M deal for 4/5 years - this would be fair on both sides. Joshua also has great chemistry with Garland - can plug in any centre in between them to make that a formidable third line.
 

TruGr1t

Proper Villain
Jun 26, 2003
23,700
7,869
Servalli said that Zadorov thinks he can get 6 x 6 in the offseason.

That would be too much for my taste.

I hope the management team keeps a flexible outlook instead of a "keep someone at all costs" approach.

Zadorov has been great for us but we also need to be able to walk away if the price gets too crazy.

With that said, I feel like they have to keep Dakota Joshua because he won't be that expensive on an annual average basis, but he's a big body that's great on the PK and the forecheck. He's a bottom six guy who's never had any contractual stability. We can easily offer a 3.5M deal for 4/5 years - this would be fair on both sides. Joshua also has great chemistry with Garland - can plug in any centre in between them to make that a formidable third line.

I think you can get him for slightly less because he likes playing here and the fans, and clearly has a good relationship with Tocchet. I'd hope for something closer to $5M AAV over 6.

I think they'll sign him, it's Lindholm I'm not convinced they'll be able to find the room. Especially if he's still looking for around $8M AAV. I also think if push comes to shove in terms of cap space, you go find another Joshua.
 

Blue and Green

Out to lunch
Dec 17, 2017
3,546
3,592
Stillman ended up being an asset...
Yeah, Allvin did get rid of Stillman for nothing more than the contract slot that washed-out Bloom is occupying, so effectively the entire remainder of Dickinson's contract was removed for a 2nd-round pick.

I think he'd be lucky to move Mikheyev at that cost but I was happily surprised by the Beauvillier trade so maybe I will be happily surprised again.
 

racerjoe

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
12,266
6,005
Vancouver
Yeah, Allvin did get rid of Stillman for nothing more than the contract slot that washed-out Bloom is occupying, so effectively the entire remainder of Dickinson's contract was removed for a 2nd-round pick.

I think he'd be lucky to move Mikheyev at that cost but I was happily surprised by the Beauvillier trade so maybe I will be happily surprised again.
Yeah I have no clue what Mik will cost to lose... the landscape around the league has changed.... but we don't know by how much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

Joe Rogan

Registered User
Jun 21, 2019
338
852
Mikheyev for Nichushkin + . Avs will pay through the nose to get rid of him, and we keep our picks
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
24,309
39,401
Junktown
Mikheyev for Nichushkin + . Avs will pay through the nose to get rid of him, and we keep our picks

Avs will almost certainly be permitted to void his contract when/if he finishes his suspension and the Player Assistance Program approves his reinstatement.
 

lawrence

Registered User
May 19, 2012
16,164
7,089


Not sure how legit this is.

Me personally, I’m not a fan of players calling their shots. 1st line pp or 1st line has to earned.
 

Bertuzzzi44

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
3,668
3,394
Should the Canucks do the unthinkable and trade Superstar Goalie Thatcher Demko? Think about the haul they’d get for him, the return would be incredible. He’s had a few injuries already and his durability is a bit of a concern going forward. We can sign a cheap veteran goalie to split starts with King Silovs, we should sign Silovs to a 1M x 7 year deal this offseason. Fortune favours the Bold.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad