Admittedly for a selfish reason. I'm currently working full time in a country with a 16 hour time difference with Vancouver. Regular season has been quite meaningless to me since I haven't been able to watch any games.
Anyway, the timing of this is really poor. Sakic and Roy were both hired after their team has acquired multiple top 3 picks.
Let's look at one sample ten years back of junior Playoff scoring...
In 2004, here are the Top ten playoff scorers in the OHL:
1 Ryan Callahan
2 Brett Trudell
3 Patrick O'Sullivan
4 Kevin Klein
5 Geoff Platt
6 Daniel Paille
7 Rick Steadman
8 Jakub Koreis
9 Matt Ryan
10 Martin St. Pierre
WHL:
1 Darren Reid
2 Chris St. Jacques
3 Randall Gelech
4 Erik Christensen
5 Clarke MacArthur
6 Ryan Kinasewich
7 Troy Bodie
8 Stefan Meyer
9 Marc Desloges
10 Ashton Rome
I couldnt find the stats for the QMJHL....
But a decade later, only about 2 out of these 20 are top 6 NHL players and maybe 3 are players worth getting excited about.
I don't know why, but whenever I see posters saying stuff like "It's about time!" and "This is awesome!", I hear these posts in a southern accent with sounds of tobacco being chewed in the background.
Purely out of curiosity, in what ways does being the president of hockey canada qualify you a good president of an NHL team? What were his responsibilities? What are the common responsibilities between running hockey canada and the canucks?
My instinct is that overseeing a fantasy squad of the country's best players is much different than an NHL team.
idea.
Nicholson as presedent, Linden as VP.
Naslund as GM, Bure as assistant GM.
Boom
Hope we get Nicholson. Other GM's respect him and bring credibility back to Van. It would be easier to make trades and sign free agents.
Gillis was a fantastic general manager who instilled so much more than just a roster on paper.
He set this franchise up for the next GM nicely.
Made a few blunders, some pretty serious ones. For the most part, he mitigated these blunders pretty well.
We'll never know the true details of what went on behind the scenes, I don't think.
Personally, knew this was inevitable, but still sad to see him go.
Great GM.
my time difference is 11 hours and i still make time to watch the bloody games
i think that's a bare minimum investment if you want to make calls about the direction of the club. being a consumer of the product, that is.
Good GMs are good GMs because they surround themselves with good people, Linden IMO is/ was the model Canuck.
He isn't completely oblivious.
I think great is a bit strong, but he certainly did things that made a difference beyond the roster. He is currently suffering so much hate because he was unlikable and hard to look at.
idea.
Nicholson as presedent, Linden as VP.
Naslund as GM, Bure as assistant GM.
Boom
He also won 1 playoff game in three years, that might be where some of the ''hate'' comes from. In addition, we were despised around the league, with the media, he had public battles with a goalie and a young center during his time here, so not all his off ice moves were great.
Needs to be Linden as Presendent / figurehead.
With Bob Nicholson as GM.
Linden is okay as long as he hires someone with a ton of experience.
Clearly the reputation of the Canucks has been greatly damaged by the the actions of Gillis. Bringing in Linden as Pres would repair the image of the Canucks around the city which they desperately need to do.
Who ever the GM is has to know the intricacies of the NHL, no break in period. This summer is possibly the most important in franchise history. High draft pick while core trades are imminent. The Canucks cannot afford to get fleeced.
@Hope_Smoke: LeBrun "we may hear over the next few days that ownership tied Gillis' hands in the Luongo saga. Gillis still the GM though"
Wow.
Wow, it's like you just listed the players who had their numbers retired by our franchise.
They were good at hockey, surely they're good at the other side of hockey. Just like when Gretzky won the Jack Adams
Boom
It's a good point but that's not really a fair comparison though as the top scorers really end up being from the two finalist teams as they play far most games. The scorers at the end of the first round gives some idea although obviously Fox and Gaunce and Horvat benefit from being on deep teams. Of note is that Gaunce and Horvat were in the top 10 last year as well.
The rapid decline from one of the better teams in the league is somewhat mind boggling? Boston continues to be one of the better teams, if not the best team, in the league. Yet the Canucks have absolutely fallen off a cliff - why is that?
Here's a hint (Mike Gillis)
I forgot to add in Gino Odjick in some capacity. Where does he fit?