zcaptain
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2012
- 1,559
- 530
Good Day Ladies, Gents and others.
As you are aware, the Vancouver Canucks are in Cap trouble
I would ask you to help with which way to go and any offers would be gratefully appreciated.
I have simplified the cap, just to shorten it................but IMO, within a acceptable variance.
Option #1.............Buyouts cost per year
Boeser...........................Annual Salary: $6,650,000...................Cap Savings $4,433,333 Cap Hit $2,216,667
Garland.........................Annual Salary: $4,950,000...................Cap Savings: $3,111,111 Cap Hit: $1,838,889
Beauvillier....................Annual Salary: $4,150,000...................Cap Savings $2,766,666 Cap Hit: $1,383,334
Option #2...............Trade with Retention
Boeser.................Annual Salary: $6,650,000 Minus buyout as Retention number ($2,216,667) = New salary of $4,433,333
Garland...............Annual Salary: $4,950,000 Minus buyout as Retention number ($1,838.889) = New salary of $3,111,111
Beauvillier..........Annual Salary: $4,150,000 minus buyout as Retention number ($1,383,334) = New salary of $2,766,666
Now, it would seem very clear that the Canucks should attempt to trade any one of this trio (maybe 2) using a number close to the retention Cap Hit and that with new numbers to the trading team all 3 players should be able to receive decent return values.
Boeser is 26 and had 55 points this year....comparables:
Garland is 27 and has averaged approx. a .63 points game scoring rate
Beauvillier is 25 and has averaged approx. a .50 points per game scoring rate
So who are the comparables, and what are their values in trade? According to NHL.COM
Boeser's comparables are: Blake Wheeler, Evgeny Kuznetsov, and Johnathon Huberdeau all at 55 points
Garland's comparables are: Sam Bennett, TJ Oshie, and Anders Lee, all who scored at an approx. .60 points per game
Beauvillier's Comparables are : Andrew Mangiapane, Anthony Cerilli, Johnathon Drouin, and Pavel Dorofeyev at .50 PPP
So, ok........this is important. I am not saying Boeser, garland, and beauvillier are as good as their comparables. I picked and chose, where I could. But even if they were close to some in production. Compare their salaries, and you will find that with their new adjusted salaries, they all have good salaries in comparison.
I suggest, that with retention as suggested, all have value, and should be close to their piers in value............whatever that may be.
My question is....does this adjustment give them value in your opinion, at the new rate?
I would suggest, with the new rates at their current production, Boeser should be valued as a late 1st round pick, and garland and Beauvillier, mid 2nd round picks...........again, that is with the retentions!
Guys! This is for my knowledge, and not a flaming exercise! But go ahead if you must!
As you are aware, the Vancouver Canucks are in Cap trouble
I would ask you to help with which way to go and any offers would be gratefully appreciated.
I have simplified the cap, just to shorten it................but IMO, within a acceptable variance.
Option #1.............Buyouts cost per year
Boeser...........................Annual Salary: $6,650,000...................Cap Savings $4,433,333 Cap Hit $2,216,667
Garland.........................Annual Salary: $4,950,000...................Cap Savings: $3,111,111 Cap Hit: $1,838,889
Beauvillier....................Annual Salary: $4,150,000...................Cap Savings $2,766,666 Cap Hit: $1,383,334
Option #2...............Trade with Retention
Boeser.................Annual Salary: $6,650,000 Minus buyout as Retention number ($2,216,667) = New salary of $4,433,333
Garland...............Annual Salary: $4,950,000 Minus buyout as Retention number ($1,838.889) = New salary of $3,111,111
Beauvillier..........Annual Salary: $4,150,000 minus buyout as Retention number ($1,383,334) = New salary of $2,766,666
Now, it would seem very clear that the Canucks should attempt to trade any one of this trio (maybe 2) using a number close to the retention Cap Hit and that with new numbers to the trading team all 3 players should be able to receive decent return values.
Boeser is 26 and had 55 points this year....comparables:
Garland is 27 and has averaged approx. a .63 points game scoring rate
Beauvillier is 25 and has averaged approx. a .50 points per game scoring rate
So who are the comparables, and what are their values in trade? According to NHL.COM
Boeser's comparables are: Blake Wheeler, Evgeny Kuznetsov, and Johnathon Huberdeau all at 55 points
Garland's comparables are: Sam Bennett, TJ Oshie, and Anders Lee, all who scored at an approx. .60 points per game
Beauvillier's Comparables are : Andrew Mangiapane, Anthony Cerilli, Johnathon Drouin, and Pavel Dorofeyev at .50 PPP
So, ok........this is important. I am not saying Boeser, garland, and beauvillier are as good as their comparables. I picked and chose, where I could. But even if they were close to some in production. Compare their salaries, and you will find that with their new adjusted salaries, they all have good salaries in comparison.
I suggest, that with retention as suggested, all have value, and should be close to their piers in value............whatever that may be.
My question is....does this adjustment give them value in your opinion, at the new rate?
I would suggest, with the new rates at their current production, Boeser should be valued as a late 1st round pick, and garland and Beauvillier, mid 2nd round picks...........again, that is with the retentions!
Guys! This is for my knowledge, and not a flaming exercise! But go ahead if you must!
Last edited:
