iceburg
Don't ask why
- Aug 31, 2003
- 7,643
- 4,017
This inevitably will lead to the probability argument again. After the mid 2nd round probabilities of making it are low. Good scouting and developing organizations will demonstrate a higher success rate overall. BUt to say any one player below say spot 45 is a bust, is not appropriate. Somewhat sadly, in the 19 years from 2000 to 2018 (not counting 2019 draft for obvious reasons) they only had around 20 picks. They, along with their draft position and my rough rating (1-5, 1 being huge success, 3 being as expected, 1 being huge disappointment), are as follows:
Hughes (7) - 5. Star already.
Woo (37) - 3. Second round pick that, even though he had a down year, still projects to have an NHL career.
Pettersson (5) - 5. Star already
Lind (33) - 3. Trending upward. Projects to be an NHLer. Time will tell.
Juolevi (5) - 2. Can't argue that he isn't a big disappointment. The only reason he isn't a 1 is because he still has a small amount of time not to move into the complete bust category.
Boeser (23) - 5. Impact vs draft position is excellent.
Virtanen (6) - 2. Could have very long NHL career. But at 6th overall, a pick is expected to be a solid top 6 forward, which he is not after 6 years. BTW. I am a huge JV fan but have to be realistic.
McCann (24) - 4. Solid performance based on later 1st round pick.
Demko (36): 4. Makings of a #1 goalie.
Horvat (9) - 4.5. Top 6 NHL and "foundational player" without a doubt. Didn't give 5 only because Hughes and Pettersson need to be separated.
Shinkaruk (24) - 2. A little disappointment. But late first round picks are 50/50.
Gaunce (26) - 2. See Shinkaruk
Jensen (29) - 2. See Shinkaruk and Gaunce.
Schroeder (22) - See Shinkaruk, Gaunce, & Jensen
Hodgson (10) - 3 would have been lower except that he was a legitimate NHLer that was having a reasonable career until injuries caught up to him.
Sauve (41) - 2. Not much to expect from 41 overall. It would have been nice for him to show better at the NHL level.
White (25) - 1. Never had a sniff
Grabner (14) - 4 Very solid NHLer though one dimensional.
Bourdon (10) R.I.P.
Schneider (26) - 4 Top tier goalie for a time. Expected from a goalie taken in the first round.
Kesler (23) - 5 Foundational player with very solid all around skill set found later in the 1st round.
Umberger (16) - 4 Long NHL career. Did not factor in challenges with Vancouver.
Smith(16) 1. Expect way more from a middle 1st rounder.
Somewhat arbitrarily I based the ratings mainly on a gut feel of "NHL impact" vs expectation of "NHL impact" based on draft position. 3 means actual NHL impact meets with their expected NHL impact based on draft position. For example, Virtanen, based on his draft position and his relatively long development curve topping out at a middle 6 forward, is disappointing but not a bust. He gets a 2 even though he may go on to have a long NHL career. Gaunce on the other hand, also gets a 2 even though he may never see the NHL again. At pick 26, a 3 might be a forward who ends up having a 300 to 400 game career as a bottom 6 forward. Again this is somewhat arbitrary but I was trying to figure out a way to mesh expectations based on draft position with actual impact. Note, the more recent picks are partially based on projection of impact.
On the later picks, 46 and above, again I can't bring myself to call any one a bust. But there have nice finds. In order:
Edler (91)
Bieksa (151)
Hansen (287)
Gaudette (149)
Raymond (51)
Hutton (147)
Cannauton (83)
Tryamkin (66)
Brown (159)
Hughes (7) - 5. Star already.
Woo (37) - 3. Second round pick that, even though he had a down year, still projects to have an NHL career.
Pettersson (5) - 5. Star already
Lind (33) - 3. Trending upward. Projects to be an NHLer. Time will tell.
Juolevi (5) - 2. Can't argue that he isn't a big disappointment. The only reason he isn't a 1 is because he still has a small amount of time not to move into the complete bust category.
Boeser (23) - 5. Impact vs draft position is excellent.
Virtanen (6) - 2. Could have very long NHL career. But at 6th overall, a pick is expected to be a solid top 6 forward, which he is not after 6 years. BTW. I am a huge JV fan but have to be realistic.
McCann (24) - 4. Solid performance based on later 1st round pick.
Demko (36): 4. Makings of a #1 goalie.
Horvat (9) - 4.5. Top 6 NHL and "foundational player" without a doubt. Didn't give 5 only because Hughes and Pettersson need to be separated.
Shinkaruk (24) - 2. A little disappointment. But late first round picks are 50/50.
Gaunce (26) - 2. See Shinkaruk
Jensen (29) - 2. See Shinkaruk and Gaunce.
Schroeder (22) - See Shinkaruk, Gaunce, & Jensen
Hodgson (10) - 3 would have been lower except that he was a legitimate NHLer that was having a reasonable career until injuries caught up to him.
Sauve (41) - 2. Not much to expect from 41 overall. It would have been nice for him to show better at the NHL level.
White (25) - 1. Never had a sniff
Grabner (14) - 4 Very solid NHLer though one dimensional.
Bourdon (10) R.I.P.
Schneider (26) - 4 Top tier goalie for a time. Expected from a goalie taken in the first round.
Kesler (23) - 5 Foundational player with very solid all around skill set found later in the 1st round.
Umberger (16) - 4 Long NHL career. Did not factor in challenges with Vancouver.
Smith(16) 1. Expect way more from a middle 1st rounder.
Somewhat arbitrarily I based the ratings mainly on a gut feel of "NHL impact" vs expectation of "NHL impact" based on draft position. 3 means actual NHL impact meets with their expected NHL impact based on draft position. For example, Virtanen, based on his draft position and his relatively long development curve topping out at a middle 6 forward, is disappointing but not a bust. He gets a 2 even though he may go on to have a long NHL career. Gaunce on the other hand, also gets a 2 even though he may never see the NHL again. At pick 26, a 3 might be a forward who ends up having a 300 to 400 game career as a bottom 6 forward. Again this is somewhat arbitrary but I was trying to figure out a way to mesh expectations based on draft position with actual impact. Note, the more recent picks are partially based on projection of impact.
On the later picks, 46 and above, again I can't bring myself to call any one a bust. But there have nice finds. In order:
Edler (91)
Bieksa (151)
Hansen (287)
Gaudette (149)
Raymond (51)
Hutton (147)
Cannauton (83)
Tryamkin (66)
Brown (159)
Last edited: