I don't care that much but devil's advocate, being around for a long time doesn't mean he has good judgement or good ideas to contribute. Being a good person doesn't necessarily equate to smart contributions. He's PROBABLY harmless, but I'd be equally happy with an iron clad rule that all we value is excellence at any role, on the ice or in management, and if you're going to be employed in a management / leadership role then you better be best of breed in your position, otherwise you start to make allowances for a Smyl...and then a Delorme...and then a Linden and a Benning.
I was listening to a couple interviews with Tom Dundon and Bill Foley and it struck me how they were clear-eyed about not being sentimental and setting a culture of high standards and the impact that ripples throughout an organization. I think the Canucks could use a lot of that, and hopefully Rutherford brings that in.