Prospect Info: Canucks 2017 Prospect Rankings - #12

[Rotting Corpse*]

which one would you trade for the other one?

thats it. thats the only reasonable thing to rate. everything else is a horrible metric. your final list should be one where you will always trade 10 for 9, 9 for 8, 8 for 7 etc...

This side steps the question; it does not answer it.

 

[Verviticus]

in this case, the question is "how do we vote?". thus, its the only thing that matters. after that, its just opinions. however you get to those conclusions is fine (except a lot of people are bad at it), but if your list doesnt conform to that rule, its a bad list. arguing about anything deeper than that is pointless

trying to establish a consensus on a thing that cant have it is a waste of time. focus on rules you can establish (the thing i said) and leave the rest up to whatever/whomever

edit: lol so yeah, you're right. dont waste time answering that question, its a bad one

 

[M2Beezy]

So does it end at 12? I think last year we went to 25 no?

 

[ChilliBilly]

once again we go off to despair ... right now we have a minor battle based on different criteria ... with 2 front runners and a also ran.

decides the next 3. Yawn.

My next choice is the swing for the fence ... Palmu ... and I still want Subban turned into a forward ....

 

[m9]

which one would you trade for the other one?

thats it. thats the only reasonable thing to rate. everything else is a horrible metric. your final list should be one where you will always trade 10 for 9, 9 for 8, 8 for 7 etc...

Absolutely. Highest asset value.

 

[Saturated Fats]

Tiebreaker coming shortly. Took Saturday off. Take a breath, Reseob.

 

[Catamarca Livin]

Tiebreaker coming shortly. Took Saturday off. Take a breath, Reseob.

add Mcenery if that is right spelling he was called up before Subban why is he not an option?