justafan22
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2014
- 11,629
- 6,249
I don't think they're gambling much at all - this mediocrity is still profitable.
I think a full rebuild would be really betting the house. Fans WOULD NOT show up for a losing team 5 years in a row. That would be betting the house: that 5 years of losses would be re-couped by a competitive team in 5 years.
I don't think they're gambling much at all - this mediocrity is still profitable.
I think a full rebuild would be really betting the house. Fans WOULD NOT show up for a losing team 5 years in a row. That would be betting the house: that 5 years of losses would be re-couped by a competitive team in 5 years.
That's simply wrong. You can't take 5 years to rebuild anymore. Good players get paid big bucks after their ELC. See what happened to the Oilers and Leafs. They got into cap hell BEFORE they won anything.I don't think they're gambling much at all - this mediocrity is still profitable.
I think a full rebuild would be really betting the house. Fans WOULD NOT show up for a losing team 5 years in a row. That would be betting the house: that 5 years of losses would be re-couped by a competitive team in 5 years.
They're still showing up for 4 years of losing in a row, what makes you think another year would change that
That's simply wrong. You can't take 5 years to rebuild anymore. Good players get paid big bucks after their ELC. See what happened to the Oilers and Leafs. They got into cap hell BEFORE they won anything.
Habs are bout to miss the PO for the 4th time in 5 years and yet...I don't think they're gambling much at all - this mediocrity is still profitable.
I think a full rebuild would be really betting the house. Fans WOULD NOT show up for a losing team 5 years in a row. That would be betting the house: that 5 years of losses would be re-couped by a competitive team in 5 years.
That you can or should plan a 5 year rebuild.sorry what part is wrong?
Habs are bout to miss the PO for the 4th time in 5 years and yet...
That you can or should plan a 5 year rebuild.
drafted 3rd overall last season, the Habs have been a bubble team for 20 games this season...Thank you for pointing that out I wasn't aware of that.
I'm talking about being at the very bottom of the standings, as opposed to a bubble team. I didn't think that would go way over so many peoples' heads.
It may not seem like there is no financial effect but hardly anyone buys Habs stuff anymore, and the waiting list for season tickets evaporated in 1 year after the 2017-18 season.drafted 3rd overall last season, the Habs have been a bubble team for 20 games this season...
besides, it's a myth... there was no uproars when Berrgevin announced a reset, and there was no uproars either when Molson later on announced it would probably take 3 to 5 years to be competitive...
That's simply wrong. You can't take 5 years to rebuild anymore. Good players get paid big bucks after their ELC. See what happened to the Oilers and Leafs. They got into cap hell BEFORE they won anything.
of course you can. building through the draft is, unquestionably, the most reliable way to build a winner. 2 or 3 years of good drafting with high picks, then 2 or 3 years for them to develop.
the Rangers are a couple years in and looking good. They're already in the playoff hunt.
the Leafs had the timeline right but made a couple mistakes and kept running into the Bruins. Perhaps instead of paying Nylander or Tavares, they should have added defense. The Oilers have made mistakes too. Pulju, Larsson.
The organization deserves this.......this is on Money Mol$on, and his pet clown, MB.It may not seem like there is no financial effect but hardly anyone buys Habs stuff anymore, and the waiting list for season tickets evaporated in 1 year after the 2017-18 season.
It may not seem like there is no financial effect but hardly anyone buys Habs stuff anymore, and the waiting list for season tickets evaporated in 1 year after the 2017-18 season.
MB has done jack squat