Here's something to mull over: In 2013-14 the Bruins racked up 117 points, more than 29 other NHL teams and 17 points ahead of the Habs, Yet the Habs won the season series and ousted the Bruins from the playoffs despite not having home ice advantage. Was it because of superior strategy and tactics? If so, why didn't the other teams in the East use the same successful formula against the Bruins? It was an open book. All they to do was study the video. What was so special about the Habs that the other East teams lacked? For example, the Rangers didn't find the Habs particularly difficult to beat in the playoffs. On Monday TB demolished the Habs 7-1. Yet last night the Habs once again took the measure of the Bruins by playing the same way they always have against them. Was it because the Bruins had played the night before and the Habs hadn't? The Habs started the season with 4 games on the road, including back-to-back games (both of which they won). I can't account for the anomalies. Ideas, anyone?
Excellent points, and you can also add to your list of anomalies the Habs ranked 26th in Corsi Close while the B's were 4th.
I am no expert, but all I can come up with is sports psychology. The Habs beat us at the so-called 'Inner Game' every time (the mental game).
I find both players and coaches at fault. I remember Darryl Sutter's response when asked what he'd be doing for the two weeks he had off during the Olympics; to which he replied something along the lines of 'figuring out how we're going to beat the Blackhawks.'
On the contrary, even after the playoff loss last year, I recall seeing our upper brass accepting the excuses of 'we had a great season, but a bad week,' as well as the injuries. Did they forget our monster winning streak was ended by (you guessed it) the Habs?
I recall Dale Weiss even pulling for the Bruins to keep their streak alive until they played them, so they could break it - which they did.
So while there are match-problems, I think the biggest problem is between the ears of our coaches and players. I hate locker room cliches, but when players say 'Now it's about which team wants it more.' Well to their credit, every time the two teams meet, that is them.
I mean we can compare the numbers of Rask and Price, but I remember when the Habs traded Budaj someone on the main board posted his stats against Boston and they were Vezina-worthy. So I'm convinced this losing transcends on-ice talent and match-ups.