Faelko
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2002
- 11,887
- 4,975
I'm just hoping for meaningful games in December......its been a while
I'd settle for Halloween...
I'm just hoping for meaningful games in December......its been a while
just a quick reminder that we play Anaheim, LA, and San Jose (neither of whom even made the playoffs) 5 times, and Chicago, St. Louis, Nashville, and Minnesota 4 times.
I think it's safe to assume 5 teams will make it from the Central, which means 3 teams make it from the Pacific. It's also fairly safe to assume LA and ANA take 2 of those three spots from the Pacific. That leaves one spot available for EDM, CGY, VAN, or SJ (ARI is not in the mix, we all know that). This is important to note because it means all the prognosticating you hear on TV about Dallas or Colorado being improved teams means absolutely nothing regarding the Oilers chances. Five teams make it from the Central, that's it. If Dallas makes it this year, it will come at the expense of another Central team that made it last year, such as Winnipeg. Dallas improving has no impact whatsoever on the Oilers' playoff chances.
Is it likely the Oilers finish ahead of all three Pacific teams? Not really, but is it possible? Absolutely. SJ and VAN are both teams trending downwards. Yes, I and many others have been saying that for years, but it will happen eventually. And as for Calgary, a helluva lot went right for them last, many players having career years or younger players playing much better than expected. I think it's very possible they take a step backwards next year even though they're probably are better on paper now after adding Hamilton.
So would I bet on the Oilers? No. But they have a chance, not a great one (VAN seems to beat the odds every year and could easily do it again), but a definitely decent chance exists.
Perfect summary. Finishing 3rd in our division is the only way we make the playoffs. Being better than Calgary and San Jose (I won't include Vancouver because I think they take a considerable step back) isn't the monstrous uphill climb some make it out to be, but we'll need some things to go right.
- stay healthy.
- be top 5 on the PP and at least be middle of the pack on the PK.
- have the young guys all take a step forward.
- have the off-season game changers (Talbot, Sekera, McDavid, McLellan) all be who we think they can be.
It's not crazy to suggest it, but I'd consider all 3 teams (us, CAL, SJ) pretty equal. I think it shakes down like this:
Us vs Calgary - They have a decided advantage on defence, no one can deny that. Goaltending I think is quite even, I personally like Talbot better, he may be a bit of an unknown, but in Hiller it's the known that is scary - he's had major collapses numerous times in his career. Forwards we have the edge by a fair margin. Coaching is no longer the huge gap it was last year.
Us vs San Jose - They have an advantage on defence, though I don't see it being as wide a margin as Calgary. Forwards are pretty equal, I like our group better overall, but they have a much greater veteran presence among their forwards that evens things out a bit. I like our goaltending better. I like our coaching better.
It's going to come down to the healthiest of these 3 teams, as well as the record heads up, but I think it should be 33.3/33.3/33.3 chances between the 3 teams of making it. When is the last time we could honestly say our team has that kind of chance heading into the season?
Thanks. I will make one prediction about the goaltending though. If Talbot plays the bulk of the minutes in net and plays like he did for the Rangers, the Oilers are in. Yes, I am going there. Superb goaltending can cover up a lot of weak spots, as we've seen time and time again in the NHL.
I think September is too early to be thinking about playoffs, though I hope every player trying to make the team believes the Oilers can make the playoffs, or else send them down to the AHL and hope they believe they can help the Condors make the playoffs (or else send them down to the ECHL ).
I'd rather look at the season like Bob Hartley did last year (I know, I hate to use the Flames for anything, but they did manage to pull off one of the best single season turnarounds in recent memory).
He broke the season down into 7 game segments and pushed the Flames to win each of those 7 game series. I like the logic, in that you don't start the season thinking you have to get 100 points or close to it, but rather that you have to win 4 out of the next 7 games. Once those 7 games are done you move on to the next 7 games and continue. I like it, especially for a team with fragile confidence like I expect the Oilers to have to start the season.
So I think the better question is can the Oilers win their first seven game series of the regular season:
Oct 08 @ St Louis
Oct 10 @ Nashville
Oct 13 @ Dallas
Oct 15 St Louis
Oct 17 @ Calgary
Oct 18 @ Vancouver
Oct 21 Detroit
In my mind, there is no reason we shouldn't be able to win at least 4 of those games (don't ask me which 4 though as that's more difficult to predict), and if we can, then we will be off to a good start for the season. If we don't, it's not like the season is over, but with each 7 game 'series' lost, the idea of meaningful games in March/April because much less likely.
Some fresh faces, a new coach, <mod edit> are a damn good start.......
I normally don't post, I just like to read and see everyones point of view, but I really struggle with a comment like this. It takes a way from an entire message and point of view you re trying to make just to be ignorant and rude to MacT. I am the first to not like what he has done with this team overall, and love the fact that he and Kevin Lowe are not running this team anymore, but just because you can hide behind your keyboard doesnt give you the right to make such a sh****** comment.
If you wouldnt say it to his face, I dont think it is appropriate to say it here. And if you would say it to his face your a jerk.
If Calgary and Colorado can make the playoffs in the years they did so can we.