Veritas
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2020
- 98
- 170
This is getting silly now lol
What exactly are you expecting from Lafreniere?
How is this silly?
a franchise player
as someone else pointed out in that other thread, do you take an 18 year old Hedman over an 18 year old Ovi?Same answer for Hughes, I'd take a franchise defenseman over a franchise winger any day of the week.
as someone else pointed out in that other thread, do you take an 18 year old Hedman over an 18 year old Ovi?
The comparison doesn't compare the two players by style or talent but emphasizing one being better than the other.
Well Ovi is much different than Laf. But even at the draft no thought Ovi would be the greatest goal scorer of all time.as someone else pointed out in that other thread, do you take an 18 year old Hedman over an 18 year old Ovi?
The comparison doesn't compare the two players by style or talent but emphasizing one being better than the other.
as someone else pointed out in that other thread, do you take an 18 year old Hedman over an 18 year old Ovi?
The comparison doesn't compare the two players by style or talent but emphasizing one being better than the other.
I still think he projects better than Taylor Hall. My point is I think Laf's talent is more than enough to justify taking him.Ovechkin is clearly in another tier than Hedman. Ovechkin vs Karlsson or Doughty is closer, and I'd probably take Karlsson over Ovechkin, maybe even Doughty for the 2008-2013 Canucks. The Canucks would have won at least one, possibly multiple cups by adding their only elite defender, I don't know if adding a 4th elite forward would have helped though.
That being said, I don't think Laf will be anything like Ovechkin. I'd take Hedman over Taylor Hall if that helps your hypothetical though.
I think it’s just a poor comparison.
We’ll see if Lafreniere can do to the league what Ovechkin did his first 5 seasons. Frankly, I doubt it.
Hedman is phenomenal now, but he took a lot longer to break out than Makar did.
I’m not even a big Ovechkin fan, but if you need a reminder for what he was like at the beginning of his career. Give this a watch.
There's a reason I wrote the last line. Because they are on different talent levels and play styles, but I wanted to emphaize what Laf can be being better enough to justify ignoring positional value.
I still think he projects better than Taylor Hall. My point is I think Laf's talent is more than enough to justify taking him.
He's a lot closer to Hall than Ovechkin imo. Reminder that Hall is a 90 pt Hart winning winger. Hall also scored very similarly to Lafreniere in their draft year, Laf only scored 6 more points than Hall did (112, 106), and Hall did it in a harder league.