greasysnapper
Registered User
- Apr 6, 2018
- 2,588
- 1,694
In 10 years someone's going to dig this proposal up and the OP is going to get fired for mental abuse.
Kings are more willing to trade Campbell before Petersen.
What about Bracco for Campbell + pick (cond. pick depending on Bracco playing NHL games).
If cap space wasn't an issue, I would do that tradekings lol at this thanks btw i needed this lol counter with campbell and clifford @ 50 % for bracco and a 2nd
Any reason people keep on saying Petersen’s the future goalie and not Campbell? Petersen’s only 2 years younger and Campbell’s actually had some success in the nhl.
This dude aint actually a Leaf fan btw.
if need be u can send a expiring contract in the tradeIf cap space wasn't an issue, I would do that trade
we have seen both play and Petersen is the better goalie. His ahl coach said this kids captain material if you could have a goalie as captain he probably would He is by far the better goalie and i love campbellAny reason people keep on saying Petersen’s the future goalie and not Campbell? Petersen’s only 2 years younger and Campbell’s actually had some success in the nhl.
C.Petersen
M.Hutchinson
2021 3rd
Campbell was just extended for two years in September, at $1.65 million. Peterson I don't believe is waiver eligible next year.
If Peterson is the future, why exactly did they choose to extend Campbell for two years? Something doesn't add up there? One of these goalies will need to be moved, it would seem. I'm not suggesting that there has been a fair offer for either here, but it looks like Kings management has given the nod to Campbell, with that contract. We see Campbell playing the NHL this year, while Peterson is back in the AHL... You'd think, if Peterson was the future, at 25, he'd be the backup... help me understand this situation. Thanks.
LA management wanted Cal to be able to play a lot and not play as a backup. He is in the A cause he can play a ton and could go without waivers. If they had sent Campbell down he would have been exposed to waivers. It’s a numbers game and Cal will be the in LA next year.
Petersen is the Heir to the Throne in LA. He is one of the least likely to be moved from LA.
And I doubt the Kings management would even move Campbell or Quick for that horrible offer and you want Cal
That's a huge no from LA
Ya its a bad offer, but lets not get dramatic and pretend LA wouldn't jump out of their shoes if this was offered for Quick.
View attachment 285903
are we allowed to be total noobs (according to you knowledgeable leafs fans) and say we'd rather keep Quickie than to insult him with a garbage proposal?
like, is it possible to decline it for other reasons than money?
is it ok oh dear hockey Gods?
Thanks. So Campbell gets moved in the offseason, to allow Peterson to play next year then?
Lol as if I'm the one not being objective. Yeah, us Leaf fans are the worst.