XXIV97
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2016
- 3,627
- 3,246
If Bouchard is a bad pick, then Boqvist must be even worse.Drafting Bouchard says otherwise...
6 points back of Boqvist with 10 games in hand
If Bouchard is a bad pick, then Boqvist must be even worse.Drafting Bouchard says otherwise...
All while wearing the "c" on his chest and playing the most/toughest minutes.If Bouchard is a bad pick, then Boqvist must be even worse.
6 points back of Boqvist with 10 games in hand
Wanna lend the time machine you use or are you just going to keep saying anything you can't prove? The kids 19. Give me a break.He was not BPA. Bouchard is not going to be among the best 15 players of that draft.
How are you not employed by a nhl team with this kind of crystal ball.He was not BPA. Bouchard is not going to be among the best 15 players of that draft.
Boqvist was the riskiest pick of the draft so he's either boom or bust. No room in between. Bouchard is likely the room in between. No boom, but not a bust. Just a middle of the road #4-6D.If Bouchard is a bad pick, then Boqvist must be even worse.
6 points back of Boqvist with 10 games in hand
Smaller Scheifele. I like that comp.Getting Scheifele vibes from this kid although a smaller Scheifele. He’s the complete package putting up good numbers on a garbage team.
We should end the conversation here so this thread doesn't get derailedBoqvist was the riskiest pick of the draft so he's either boom or bust. No room in between. Bouchard is likely the room in between. No boom, but not a bust. Just a middle of the road #4-6D.
Bouchard won't be a top pairing caliber defender.
If Bouchard is a bad pick, then Boqvist must be even worse.
6 points back of Boqvist with 10 games in hand
He was not BPA. Bouchard is not going to be among the best 15 players of that draft.
Reminds me a little of Point. I think he's the second best player in this draft personally...
His brother is 6’4” and he’s listed at 5’11”. Anyone know if he looks taller this year or thinks he still might have room to grow?
Id be super happy with him as a canucks fanHe seems like a Canucks pick, good character, leadership, skilled scorer, two-way type, a hella determined young man.
They finished second last in the WHL. They won 13 games out of 68, with a -143 goal differential. His team is terrible.Does anyone have some insight on his +/- that is second on the team at -50? The team's style of play?
Does anyone have some insight on his +/- that is second on the team at -50? The team's style of play?
Does anyone have some insight on his +/- that is second on the team at -50? The team's style of play?
This is something I've been considering heavily. For example, the situation is completely different with USNTDP where they absolutely obliterate the vast majority of their opponents and constantly control the play. Krebs's situation is the polar opposite of that. I wonder how heavily the team needs to be weighed, exactly. I too agree that it's very impressive to be able to produce and to make a difference in spite of the team being very poor, that's what is most difficult.Kootenay is/has been terrible for some time. A good season for them is finishing 10 points out of the playoffs. Krebs, White, and McClennon are their only offensive threats, and the fact that he still put up the offensive stats he was able to bodes well in the future. Teams game planned around him all season, but he still found ways to score. Takes a special player to do that.
This is something I've been considering heavily. For example, the situation is completely different with USNTDP where they absolutely obliterate the vast majority of their opponents and constantly control the play. Krebs's situation is the polar opposite of that. I wonder how heavily the team needs to be weighed, exactly. I too agree that it's very impressive to be able to produce and to make a difference in spite of the team being very poor, that's what is most difficult.
It's very possible Krebs is getting underrated in relation to some USNTDP players due to this.