Montecristo
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2012
- 6,921
- 2,146
Proposal: Bruins-senators
- Thread starter Montecristo
- Start date
Love it as a Bruins fan, but we don't get those pieces without giving up names like Heinen, Studnicka and Vaakanainen.
SpezDispenser
Registered User
- Aug 15, 2007
- 26,760
- 6,275
Montecristo
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2012
- 6,921
- 2,146
Instead of my proposal or in addition too? I make either trade honestly I just figured Ottawa would want a pick
Super Cake
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2013
- 30,998
- 6,424
bert
Registered User
I wouldnt do that for Stone at this point let alone adding Dzingel. Quantity with decent draft pedigree but not real quality. Sens need RD that are either a high end prospect or proven.
Honestly pretty fair. They may be able to get a little more if they moved them seperately but not much and PD is dumb enough where I think that'd be a respectable haul for him.
Montecristo
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2012
- 6,921
- 2,146
I think you’re overselling stone. Most rentals no matter how good they are go for more than just a 1st. Maybe a first + a mid level prospect or 2. Certainly not a 1st plus a top 9 forward + a top prospect. Nash went for essentially Lindgren and a 1st. Mid tier d prospect and a 1st. Stone maybe goes for zboril + 1st + studnicka since stone is better than Nash. But adding heinen to that should bring dzingel in.
Zboril+studnicka+1st+heinen final offer for stone and dzingel
BK201
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 10,815
- 308
Too light for interdivisional tbh. This is a sore spot for Ottawa yes.
Edit: mind you i know nothing of federick or bjork just assume its fodder.
too bad you did not consider the salary cap.Bruins are up against it..........
Montecristo
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2012
- 6,921
- 2,146
Are they? Cap friendly says they have like 18 million on deadline space. 6.7 for pasta, 3.2 for coyle, 7 for stone that’s 16. But Frederic’s million goes the other way so that’s 3 left for dzingels 1.8. Seems like it fits pretty easy
easton117
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2017
- 5,078
- 5,664
Man I got shredded for posting something similar in the Bruins forums.
Even had a conditional 2nd instead of the first in there.
Montecristo
Registered User
- Jul 29, 2012
- 6,921
- 2,146
Oh that’s because both of those deals are bruins overpays. Rentals don’t get a top prospect, a cost controlled top 9 forward and a 1st. They get 1, maybe 2 of those things. But absolutely not all 3. Heinen + 1st, eh maybe. Studnicka +1st, yes. All 3? No. Might as well toss in zboril and have Ottawa tag dzingel. That’s how much more those 3 are worth than stone on an expiring deal. So much more valuable that zborils addition requires another 30 goal guy (this season)
easton117
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2017
- 5,078
- 5,664
I forget now. Think I posted 2nd conditional if he signs it’s a 1st/Frederick/Zboril?
Something like that. Frankly, if Nashville wants him they’ll knock that out of the park. Which truthfully maybe they should. They’ve gotta be in the top 3 front runners this year. Stone would be a huge add.
I understand wanting to keep your top forward prospect, but I also think you guys would be remiss to waste this window by sitting on your hands as opposed to getting one of the premier two-way forwards in the game.
easton117
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2017
- 5,078
- 5,664
Lol judging by the debates on the Bruins boards I think you just found the wedge in the fan base.
Some want to cash in now for Bergeron et al.
Others want to hold on to everyone and develop.
Tough to do both at once.
