GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 187,482
- 39,480
Does Stefanski have that great of a track record? & who is even making these decisions with Dorsey gone? Thats a big question on its own.
Good point about his OL being destroyed yesterday.It's the Browns and these things always end poorly with them so it'll be tough to overcome that but Stefanski is a good coach. I think he'll help Baker quite a bit and put him in a position to succeed. The only question I'd have with him is how much was the Vikings offensive success him and how much was it Kubiak? If he brings Kubiak with him to Cleveland, which would really suck for the Vikings, then it doesn't matter but it's worth wondering if he doesn't.
I also think it's a bit ridiculous to complain about him and say he shouldn't be hired based on what happened yesterday. It's only one game and the Vikings OL got completely dominated so I'm not sure how much play calling was at fault. If the Browns made this decision after the Saints game this wouldn't even be a conversation and that was literally one game ago.
And the Browns need to improve the OL as well. Almost a carbon copy of the Vikings talent wise on O in the skill positions. But all comes down to the OL. They can run block fairly well with Chubb. Pass protection needs work.Good point about his OL being destroyed yesterday.
There’s not much you can call when your line can’t block.
The Browns need a guy who can keep all of the big personalities in line, help Mayfield progress versus regress, get disciplined performance out of the whole team (cut out the dumb procedural penalties), and put together and execute a quality offensive game plan.
Is this guy the one to do it? No idea.
In his defense, he’s been coaching Kirk Cousins the past two seasons.Don't understand what other teams see so much out of Vikings' OCs that one of them gets at HC job every other year. Stefanski is okay but nothing I have seen from him looks like he's another McVay, Shanahan, or Pederson just waiting to breakout.
The Vikings offense (arguably top 5 talent overall at the RB/WR/TE positions) under-performed with him at the helm.
This explains a lot. No chance they were getting a elite/veteran coach with stipulations such as this.
Browns gonna Browns
Did any veteran or elite coach turn them down?
But they also interviewed seven or eight candidates. The only one to turn them down was Rhule. The only guy they interviewed who took another job was McCarthy, be it also looks like that was worked out weeks ago.I don’t think they would even get an interview with rules like that. The coach essentially has 0 say, which is why a first timer like Stefanski was OK with it.
Is having Baker Mayfield really a step up from that though?In his defense, he’s been coaching Kirk Cousins the past two seasons.
If he's a good coach who can get the most out of his QB, then that's an easy yes.Is having Baker Mayfield really a step up from that though?
Is having Baker Mayfield really a step up from that though?
This explains a lot. No chance they were getting a elite/veteran coach with stipulations such as this.
Browns gonna Browns