Speculation: Brooks: Tampa after Shattenkirk

[Webster]

I remember there was some bad blood when Callahan left, I'm not so sure management wants him back.

 

[eco's bones]

Cally was my favorite forward during that era. I don't want him back. He can **** off. I know it's business but **** off. I don't think he'd want to come back, either.

Cally's got one more year after this one. Shattenkirk has two. He's not the glue holding our defense together and he's not been a huge offensive threat either. We're not going anywhere with Cally either but we'd be out from under in one year instead of two. The team gets younger faster and picks up other assets. Works for me.

 

[nyr2k2]

Cally's got one more year after this one. Shattenkirk has two. He's not the glue holding our defense together and he's not been a huge offensive threat either. We're not going anywhere with Cally either but we'd be out from under in one year instead of two. The team gets younger faster and picks up other assets. Works for me.

It makes plenty of sense from a hockey move perspective. I just don't want Callahan on my team.

 

[Machinehead]

What if it's a different RHD defenseman they are scouting, one not named Shattenkirk or ADA.

 

[UAGoalieGuy]

It'd have to be a pretty sweet deal for something like that to happen. Especially if we're retaining on Shattenkirk.

I mean a guaranteed #1 this year, a chance for another next year and at worst a #2 then Raddysh who is having a great rookie year in the AHL as a 20 y/o is a good return.

@bobbop mentioned in his update this morning that the Rangers were looking to potentially move someone that hasn't really been discussed in some rumors. Shattenkirk really hasnt been talked about. Also an "unconventional" move and wanting to to save some space for a move.

Edit: oh and we need their 7th in 2020 since the Rangers are trying to monopolize all the picks in that round in that year.

 

[eco's bones]

It makes plenty of sense from a hockey move perspective. I just don't want Callahan on my team.

Overall he was a good Ranger. I don't blame players for not giving a discount. That's pretty much why we moved him. He couldn't live up to his new contract and I don't forsee us giving him another. Anyway worse comes to worse we can buy him out but generally he's always been a team oriented kind of player. I expect the effort will be there but probably not a lot of points.

 

[Rempe73]

Shattenkirk at 50% retained. Remove the condition from this year’s pick, and make it a guaranteed 1st. Also, we’ll take year’s 2nd rounder, and maybe a Tammela or a Volkov if they value him highly. Personally, I would dump Shattenkirk at 50% retained for a 1st rounder and that’s it. But I doubt it happens.

 

[Rempe73]

Even if Tampa wanted it, it’s not happening. I love the guy, but the organization seems to strangely value him like he’s the next McDonagh or Letang.

 

[Fitzy]

Even if Tampa wanted it, it’s not happening. I love the guy, but the organization seems to strangely value him like he’s the next McDonagh or Letang.

He's more likely the next Rosival, which isn't that bad.

 

[Tawnos]

I remember there was some bad blood when Callahan left, I'm not so sure management wants him back.

The bad blood is entirely in the minds of a bunch of deluded fans.

 

[Trxjw]

I mean a guaranteed #1 this year, a chance for another next year and at worst a #2 then Raddysh who is having a great rookie year in the AHL as a 20 y/o is a good return.

@bobbop mentioned in his update this morning that the Rangers were looking to potentially move someone that hasn't really been discussed in some rumors. Shattenkirk really hasnt been talked about. Also an "unconventional" move and wanting to to save some space for a move.

Edit: oh and we need their 7th in 2020 since the Rangers are trying to monopolize all the picks in that round in that year.

That's a package I'd do. That being said, I think McQuaid might be a guy they're more interested in.

 

[Riche16]

Look this is rabid speculation by Brooks and more than likely he’s being the mouthpiece again because it makes less than ZERO sense.

But Cally coming back for a yr isn’t the worse thing ever.

That being said, if we are helping them, AGAIN I want a damn good prospect NOT conditions of a pick we may already own! Not to mention that they can’t trade their 1 or 2 because of that condition.

They have to give us someONE really good to get those conditions removed

 

[Beacon]

With all of these ex-Rangers on a Stanley Cup favorite you have to wonder why we just didn't keep them all in the first place.
^ The above is humor. Calm down.

We didn't have Stamkos, Kucherov, Point, Tyler Johnson or Hedman.

 

[Leonardo87]

The bad blood is entirely in the minds of a bunch of deluded fans.

Yeah I don’t get that. When there were rumors last summer, He even said that he’d welcome a trade and would feel comfortable in the organization, if he came back to the Rangers. He doesn’t want to leave a contender but if he has no choice, nothing he can do.

 

[Beacon]

Shatty @50% for Cal Foote and a first round pick (which becomes a 2020 pick if we get their 2019 pick as a result of hitting the McDonagh trade condition). And their 2020 7th rounder because we collect those. If they fail to win the Cup this year, they don't need to send us their second rounder to complete the McDonagh trade.

So if they fail to win the Cup, it's Shatty @50% and a second rounder for a first and Foote; if they do wi the Cup, then Shatty @50% for Foote+#1.

 

[Hi ImHFNYR]

Ok, Bern.

Bern would never have the self awareness to laugh at his own ridiculous proposal. Just for that make it 6 1sts and a winger for synergy

 

[aufheben]

I don't really see any reason here for this to have it's own thread.