Who he misses:
On Triple H:
On Roman Reigns:
On Dean Ambrose:
For the full article: http://www.si.com/extra-mustard/201...e-h-survivor-series-seth-rollins-daniel-bryan
It is a fantastic read which I highly recommend. He also discusses European talents in the WWE and why they're held back because of Vince, Kevin Owens, Bray Wyatt, The Undertaker and Undertaker's feelings towards backstage politics, his thoughts on Seth Rollins as a worker, whose side he'd take on the Punk vs. WWE issue and why, bad booking hurting Roman Reigns and Survivor Series.
“I miss Daniel Bryan and CM Punk since they both exited the scene, and I find myself watching wrestling less and less since those guys left,” said Hart. “I don’t know if they’ve filled their shoes. Dean Ambrose has done a lot to fill their space, and I really enjoy watching him, but it’s going to be a tough job for whoever wins the championship–that person will have a lot of weight on his back to carry the team.”
On Triple H:
“Triple H is a bodybuilder nut. He goes after the bodies. He doesn’t care how good–and he can look in the mirror–guys work, he cares how guys look. Punk and Bryan are guys concerned with how they work. It’s a different philosophy. I admire Punk for taking his stand. He was the guy doing all the work, every week, going injured, and here’s a guy sitting at home–working three or four times a year–and you’re going to give him the main event at WrestleMania? I’m not buying it.”
“Vince is sorry that they lost Punk,” said Hart. “Vince has a better sense of wrestlers’ look and their work, and Triple H is more prone to bodybuilders. If a guy is 6’5” and has a bodybuilder’s physique, that’s all that matters to him. But he’s wrong.”
On Roman Reigns:
“Reigns is just like Kevin Nash,” said Hart. “If you look back at Reigns, his character was getting over really good on his own. Then they rushed him into a babyface turn and crammed him down everybody’s thoughts, and people rejected him. It wasn’t his fault. It was kind of like with Kevin Nash. He was slowly getting over, and I wrestled him at [the 1994] King of the Ring and we had a really good match. All of a sudden, by August, they were ready to make him the new champion. And I’m going, ‘He’s not ready yet. Give him a little time and let him get even more over.’ Why is there a rush? Reigns got dealt a bad set of cards. It has nothing to do with his work rate–he’s a really good worker and his style is really good. He just needs to be himself.
On Dean Ambrose:
“I watch Dean Ambrose and I really admire him,” said Hart. “He likes to put emotion into the match. There’s a lot of drama and he gets a lot out of the expressions and body language. That’s forgotten by too many wrestlers. My criticism of wrestlers today is that they’re all high spot monkeys. Everything is a high spot, and they go right into the next move to the next move to the next move. Then we forget what they just did. We can’t register all that. Guys are forgetting how to tell a story. Nobody sells anything or registers or enough in wrestling today. They do some absolutely breathtaking moves and get back up on their feet and do another running spot, missing the whole point of what they just did. Dean Ambrose is a guy who takes his time with his storyline and his moves, and he gets the most mileage out of the simplest things.”
For the full article: http://www.si.com/extra-mustard/201...e-h-survivor-series-seth-rollins-daniel-bryan
It is a fantastic read which I highly recommend. He also discusses European talents in the WWE and why they're held back because of Vince, Kevin Owens, Bray Wyatt, The Undertaker and Undertaker's feelings towards backstage politics, his thoughts on Seth Rollins as a worker, whose side he'd take on the Punk vs. WWE issue and why, bad booking hurting Roman Reigns and Survivor Series.