Johnny GODreau
Boom
- Aug 21, 2014
- 8,582
- 22
That's a stretch.
There is a reason why he is effective at his size. If he was any taller than his gameplay might change the way he plays.
He might lose his tenacity?
That's a stretch.
There is a reason why he is effective at his size. If he was any taller than his gameplay might change the way he plays.
There is a reason why he is effective at his size. If he was any taller than his gameplay might change the way he plays.
He might lose his tenacity?
If Byron had genes where he was over 6 feet, wouldn't you think it change the way he played over his hockey career and minor hockey? Byron had to adapt due to his playing size. Sure in the early years size may have not been as a huge factor, but when getting to Juniors and up it's prevalent. It was either Byron adapted or not make the NHL eventually.
If he was over 6 feet he maybe wouldn't have to be as aggressive and tenacious to stick in the NHL as a bottom 6 player.
You make good point, If he was 6'0 he'd be another Raymond.
You make good point, If he was 6'0 he'd be another Raymond.
If I understand this right you want him to water it down like he does the talent on our roster?Raymond can make sure that there is enough ice in the gatorade cooler.
If I understand this right you want him to water it down like he does the talent on our roster?
next time I want an ice cube I am just going to ask for a Mason RaymondBasically, that is correct.
next time I want an ice cube I am just going to ask for a Mason Raymond
That's a stretch.
There is a reason why he is effective at his size. If he was any taller than his gameplay might change the way he plays.