Blues Trade Proposals 2018-2019 - Part IV

[EastonBlues22]

Blues Trade Proposals 2018-2019 - Part III

Continue

Click to read more...

 

[CaliforniaBlues310]

Does anybody see any way Armstrong could try and pry Panarin out of Columbus, in an attempt to lure Quenneville to St. Louis? He was very upset that Bowman traded him, and he would also make Tarasenko happier. I also think we are one more elite forward away from truly having a cup contending forward core.

I’d do as much as this to get him here, especially if he resigns with us

Kyrou+Steen+Blais/Walman+2020 1st+conditional pick.

Our top 9 would actually be sick

Schwartz-O’Reilly-Schenn
Panarin-Bozak-Tarasenko
Fabbri-Thomas-Perron

 

[Frenzy31]

He is a UFA. That is a high price to lay for someone who might bolt... likely would bolt.

 

[Stealth JD]

Can Panarin solve the D-woes and stop the puck from entering the Blues net? If so...absolutely go get him. Otherwise, it's probably not a wise move to expend assets on a guy who would likely find STL to be no more attractive a situation than the one he currently finds himself refusing to extend with in Columbus.

 

[Stupendous Yappi]

Does anybody see any way Armstrong could try and pry Panarin out of Columbus, in an attempt to lure Quenneville to St. Louis? He was very upset that Bowman traded him, and he would also make Tarasenko happier. I also think we are one more elite forward away from truly having a cup contending forward core.

I’d do as much as this to get him here, especially if he resigns with us

Kyrou+Steen+Blais/Walman+2020 1st+conditional pick.

Our top 9 would actually be sick

Schwartz-O’Reilly-Schenn
Panarin-Bozak-Tarasenko
Fabbri-Thomas-Perron

I'm not sure what the rules are about trading a 1st that is part of a trade already committed to. Maybe it would just lock this year's pick for Buffalo even if it is in the Top 10? Either way, that sounds horrible.

 

[Dbrownss]

I'm not sure what the rules are about trading a 1st that is part of a trade already committed to. Maybe it would just lock this year's pick for Buffalo even if it is in the Top 10? Either way, that sounds horrible.

Yea, it would guarantee Buffalo our 2019 1st. Terrible idea....

 

[Dbrownss]

Does anybody see any way Armstrong could try and pry Panarin out of Columbus, in an attempt to lure Quenneville to St. Louis? He was very upset that Bowman traded him, and he would also make Tarasenko happier. I also think we are one more elite forward away from truly having a cup contending forward core.

I’d do as much as this to get him here, especially if he resigns with us

Kyrou+Steen+Blais/Walman+2020 1st+conditional pick.

Our top 9 would actually be sick

Schwartz-O’Reilly-Schenn
Panarin-Bozak-Tarasenko
Fabbri-Thomas-Perron

What happens when he doesnt re-sign, and the Blues lose a top 10 pick this year and next year because this team isnt a top line LW from being "good". We'd lose our best prospect, and 2 potential top 10 picks....

 

[cardinalnation]

I have been all about Panarin since the first game of the year. He is exactly the type of speed/ possession player we need. These guys are right though. I have read he will be seeking upward if 10 million a year and might want to play in a bigger market. Now he could be traded because he will not be signing in Columbus, but he would be just a rental most likely. Bob is probably a more realistic Target to sign but they would have to find a taker for Allen first. The contracts just don't work. Same goes for Jimmy Howard. Detroit would have to take Allen in the trade.

 

[Reality Czech]

Panarin signing here is less likely than Tavares, and that was pretty unlikely.

 

[WeWentBlues]

Sorry but this just doesnt make any sense.

 

[Xanadude]

Panarin is amazing and I'd love to see him wearing the note, but there's no way. If we were in the thick of things this year and our defense was somewhat competent, I'd support a rental trade, but this year is not the year to mortgage our future. Our future is all we've got!

 

[ScratchCatFever]

Does anybody see any way Armstrong could try and pry Panarin out of Columbus, in an attempt to lure Quenneville to St. Louis? He was very upset that Bowman traded him, and he would also make Tarasenko happier. I also think we are one more elite forward away from truly having a cup contending forward core.

I’d do as much as this to get him here, especially if he resigns with us

Kyrou+Steen+Blais/Walman+2020 1st+conditional pick.

Our top 9 would actually be sick

Schwartz-O’Reilly-Schenn
Panarin-Bozak-Tarasenko
Fabbri-Thomas-Perron

Nope.

 

[CaliforniaBlues310]

Figured it was too much of a dream scenario.

 

[Blanick]

Figured it was too much of a dream scenario.

I think no matter what happens during the season Panarin is going to test free agency next summer. Army wouldn't be doing his job if he doesn't reach out then to see if there is even the slightest interest but all signs point to Panarin wanting to go to a big market. You never know though maybe a miracle will happen. Spending assets to obtain him this year when the Blues are where they are in the standings would be an very irresponsible move.

 

[Zamadoo]

I hope we heavily pursue UFA Panarin, and it has nothing to do with Quenneville.

 

[Ranksu]

Finland vs Sweden start soon..

 

[Blueston]

Finland vs Sweden start soon..

Sweden started. Not so sure about Finns.

 

[Thallis]

Can Panarin solve the D-woes and stop the puck from entering the Blues net? If so...absolutely go get him. Otherwise, it's probably not a wise move to expend assets on a guy who would likely find STL to be no more attractive a situation than the one he currently finds himself refusing to extend with in Columbus.

The biggest woe our team has on defense is our inability to keep the puck in the offensive zone, so yes, he would help a lot. The problem is it's insanely unlikely we can extend him, so we're spending all those assets for no real reason.

 

[Stealth JD]

The biggest woe our team has on defense is our inability to keep the puck in the offensive zone, so yes, he would help a lot. The problem is it's insanely unlikely we can extend him, so we're spending all those assets for no real reason.

Agree. The "otherwise" probably should have said "regardless". But even at 20-minutes/night of ice-time, Panarin isn't solving all of defensive/goaltending problems; he isn't exactly known as a defensive wizard.

 

[bleedblue1223]

Panarin would significantly improve our issues on offense and PP, but he wants a big market, so it's Tavares all over again. It's just not realistic.

 

[Saint Loser]

Finland vs Sweden start soon..

It's the Battle of Sáminavia!

 

[Blueston]

I posted this on main board and Stars fans seem perhaps receptive: Tarasenko and Schenn to Dallas for Seguin and Shore. Would you do it?

 

[BlueDream]

I posted this on main board and Stars fans seem perhaps receptive: Tarasenko and Schenn to Dallas for Seguin and Shore. Would you do it?

I'd want them to add a 2nd onto that, and then I'd consider it.

 

[Alklha]

I posted this on main board and Stars fans seem perhaps receptive: Tarasenko and Schenn to Dallas for Seguin and Shore. Would you do it?

If Schenn isn't going to extend? I'd probably do that.

If Schenn is going to extend? I'd rather have Tarasenko & Schenn at ~$14m than Seguin & Shore at $13m.

 

[Goulet17]

Not saying it means anything, but there is this: