charlie1
It's all McDonald's
- Dec 7, 2013
- 3,132
- 0
Why would anyone take Mike Smith over Halak?
No one trolls better than Mike Smith.
Why would anyone take Mike Smith over Halak?
Defintely not Fleury. League-average goaltender at best. Mentally questionable. Would hate to have to rely on him in the playoffs.
Defintely not Niemi. I follow the Sharks and he is just not that good anymore. Most Sharks fans are hoping Stalock will take over next year.
Not Lehtonen. Don't know why people are high on him. His Sv% has always hovered around league average. The best thing about him is that he sits on top of the net. He's ok, but I'll take Halak over him.
Not Rinne. Maybe Rinne of three years ago, but he has been well below average recently, and has had major hip problems.
Crawford vs. Halak is a toss-up for me.
I agree with the rest.
Rask
Fleury
Price
Lundqvist
Schneider
Miller
Crawford
Quick
Niemi
Luongo
Lehtonen
Rinne
And I can make a case for both Bob and Smith
These are all goalies I would take over Halak on first thought. This isnt counting goalies who are similar such as Howard, or ones that I think have great potential like Holtby / Bernier / Bishop.
That would leave Halak around the middle of the pack...I think that assessment is dead on.
Don't worry about Broadway Jay. He claims that Halak > Quick this past (regular) season. Mainly due to Corsi (another reason why Corsi isn't the end all/be all of stats).
Jay is a solid poster. there is a reason that teams are turning to more in-depth stats.
just wondering... what do you like about the Isles? is there anything?