By 13,000 he's talking about season ticket holders which have dropped down to 9,500. Some good insights in this article on why that is including:“I wouldn’t be honest with you if I didn’t say, ‘We’ve got to get back to 13,000,’” Chipman said. “This place we find ourselves in right now, it’s not going to work over the long haul. It just isn’t.”
As much as fans hate corporations buying up tons of tickets, it can be a lot more sustainable than relying on average people to buy tickets to 41 games a yearThey managed to fill the building for more than a decade despite having just 15 percent of their season seats purchased by businesses. That lags well below the norm in a league in which some teams sell 50 percent of their tickets to corporate interests, according to Chipman.
In 2011 when the Jets came back people were so excited - they formed all kinds of groups and consortiums where season tickets would be shared between 4, 6 , 8 or more people. Over time a lot of those groups had people drop out, unable to recruit more to take their place. As well tickets became more affordable on the secondary market so people just started dropping their season ticket packages.I know the title is clickbaity but that's what they chose. The full quote is :
By 13,000 he's talking about season ticket holders which have dropped down to 9,500. Some good insights in this article on why that is including:
As much as fans hate corporations buying up tons of tickets, it can be a lot more sustainable than relying on average people to buy tickets to 41 games a year
You know, True North could help the situation by treating season ticket holders more like friends and less like leaseholders. I don't recall ever getting a keychain, t-shirt, hat, because I have season tickets. They give you 10% off of the Jets store, whoop-de-do, guess I'll just spend the 5-10 bucks i save on a budweiser, if it's even enough.In 2011 when the Jets came back people were so excited - they formed all kinds of groups and consortiums where season tickets would be shared between 4, 6 , 8 or more people. Over time a lot of those groups had people drop out, unable to recruit more to take their place. As well tickets became more affordable on the secondary market so people just started dropping their season ticket packages.
I know Winnipeg doesn't have a whole lot of corporate head offices - the kinds that might buy big luxury suites. But the team is complaining about just regular season tickets. Winnipeg would seem to have all kinds of businesses that could purchase season tickets: think doctors, lawyers, car dealerships, retail outlets, etc.
The title says the jets "aren't going to work over the long haul." What he actually said was that the amount of season ticket holders is too low and unsustainable.I don't really think the title is clickbait. It's a direct quote of what Chipman said and it wasn't like they picked an out of context part of the quote and misconstrue it.
Completely impractical.The MLB shot down the Tampa Bay Rays plan of spending half of their 81 home games in Montreal, for good reason. Not only does that cut your fanbase in half but that's quite a wide geographical distance. All of your players would need apartments in two different countries, increased travel costs, etc.
Winnipeg-Quebec is roughly the same distance as the crow flies as Tampa-Montreal, but you would only have to deal with one singular country at least. Each city has a modern NHL facility. And only sitting 41 games instead of 81 would make the logistics a lot simpler. How impractical would it be for the Jets to split their home games with Quebec?
Winnipeg has plenty of mid-to-high income peoeple who could buy up the remainding season tickets. TNSE will never convince them to by saying "give us more money or we'll leave,and everyone will be laughing at Winnipeg and saying "SEE!!! WE WERE RIGHT!!!." It just makes us laugh. I know a couple very wealthy people who couldn't give a shit about going to the games they have tickets for right now, they have no goodwill towards TNSE at all, the team was a disaster and a soap opera for the last few seasons, if not more; and still they love hockey and the Jets through-and-through.
/end rant
Well, definitely a soap opera, and a frustrating, disheartening one. Disaster is stretching it, but among the people I'm talking about, they are real hockey fans, and they have much more interest watching a team be built right than limping along to avoid a rebuild. The issue was more effort, and drama, not that they weren't top of the league.I have to say as a Jets fan living in Edmonton for over 10 years - if you think the last few Jets season were a "disaster and a soap opera" - whoo boy, Winnipeg is in trouble when (not if) the Jets have to do a major re-tooling...
Is Winnipeg more economically depressed than other Canadian cities?
I think everywhere is struggling but the issue in Manitoba is we don’t have a “have” thing, an economic stimulator like oil in Alberta or potash in Sask. We don’t get high in regards to huge employment boom and investments from all over the world. But with that being said we have a large population under the poverty line and rent/costs going up more than any salaries or government supports is noticeable.Is Winnipeg more economically depressed than other Canadian cities?
Look, basically from the moment that the NHL returned to Winnipeg, we knew that the Jets were particularly at risk in the event of any kind of bad economic times. They're the smallest market, after all. That means they have less leeway or margin of error compared to larger cities.
That being said, I expect them to be fine longterm. Their ownership is insanely wealthy and I somehow doubt that they want to make themselves permanent personas non grata in Manitoba if they ever intimate a relocation threat.
I completely forgot that a Jets owner was one of the holdover peers. Old money play titles will never not be funny to me.
This is not a good look for Winnipeg. The signs have been there for a few years now. The honeymoon phase is long gone. Put up or shut up time. Either fill the barn every night or gas up the trucks and begin the journey back to Atlanta.
I don’t forsee Thomson and Chipman allowing them to leave just based on the fact they have built so much around the arena and the success of those ventures revolves around having an NHL team. But I also know Thomson is the investor and Chipman the owner/operator. If things start down a losing path, investors are never happy unless money is coming in.The honeymoon - now almost 13 years old - is clearly over.
The team is also clearly signaling the team needs to sell more tickets.
The team is not however moving any time soon. Both owners have deep investment in downtown Winnipeg real estate which are aided by the Jets being present there.
Could they move long-term? Sure. I'd put the Jets in at least the top 10 of relocation risks - maybe top 5. But it's not happening in 2024 or 2025.