Better career: Kesler or Pavelski?

Discussion in 'Polls - (hockey-related only)' started by 50 Sheas of Grey, Oct 9, 2018.

?

Who has had the better career?

  1. Kesler

    22.2%
  2. Pavelski

    77.8%
  1. 50 Sheas of Grey

    50 Sheas of Grey Pettersson for Selke

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2016
    Messages:
    3,152
    Likes Received:
    1,483
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Kesler:

    Regular season: GP: 941 / G: 253 / A: 312 / P: 565
    Playoffs: GP: 101 / G: 24 / A: 41 / P: 65
    Won a Selke in 2010-2011.


    Pavelski:

    Regular season: GP: 891 / G: 317 / A: 380 / P: 697
    Playoffs: GP: 121 / G: 44 / A: 47 / P: 91

    Both have a 41 goal season under their belt. Both have the same Olympic hardware. Both are/were heralded for their two-way play.
     
  2. ESH

    ESH Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2011
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Not really fair to put them in the same category for defensive play. Kesler was arguably the best defensive forward in the game at his peak, while Pavelski has simply been a solid two-way player.
     
    Spazkat likes this.
  3. tony d

    tony d Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    69,571
    Likes Received:
    1,969
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Office Worker
    Location:
    Behind A Tree
    Pavelski.
     
  4. COHawk

    COHawk Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2015
    Messages:
    1,530
    Likes Received:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    105
    .60 vs. .78 points per game is not close enough to give the edge to defensive play. This is easily Pavelski.
     
  5. Elvs

    Elvs Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,037
    Likes Received:
    960
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Occupation:
    Sports writer
    Location:
    Pitea, Sweden
    It's Kesler for peak, but Pavelski has been more consistant on offense. I went with Kesler because of peak, and the fact that he's won the Selke and been nominated for it at least one other time from what I recall. Yes, Pavelski has the better PPG ratio, but he's seen more time as a 1st line player and on the top PP unit, where Kesler has always been a 2nd line center behind Sedin and Getzlaf, and often hasn't been on the top PP unit. With my avatar I'm sure I come off as a homer, but I've never even liked Kesler. Ignoring teams, I even like Pavelski better.
     
  6. Ctrain2k

    Ctrain2k Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,650
    Likes Received:
    771
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Edmonton
    I agree with everything you said.
     
  7. CanadianSharks

    CanadianSharks Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Messages:
    28,930
    Likes Received:
    1,233
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Pavelski no question. He peaked just as high, and maintained it longer.
    It really is fair. Pavelski was a Selke calibre forward in his prime.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"