Wats
Error 520
- Mar 8, 2006
- 42,015
- 6,689
You said no top six was acquired after Cammy. Since when is a 35 goal scorer not a top six forward? He still went on to have better seasons than anything MB acquired and given that he had to buyout Parentau it would have just been better to keep him. Even sucky Bourque helped this team get to the ECF. I'll take one good year over five years of nothing. Keeping Therrien is a five year tank move.
Cole gets 61 points in 1st year and 81 points combined in last 3 seasons of his contract. Like I said...with this logic, Gomez would also fit as acquiring a top 6 player because he put up 59 points in his first year. That's why I excluded both.
Gomez, one of the worst contracts in the entire league was the same as a FA signed who went on to be our first power forward in 10 years and scored 35 goals? That isn't to mention the way Cole helped Paciorettys and DD's game. The Cole/DD/Pac line was incredible to watch but I guess you have no taste for dynamic hockey. Funny how you **** on the Cole signing and then praise the Vanek move. We gave up less and got more out of Cole than Vanek by a mile but no the Vanek move was building the future, a true transition right?
Oh no not aging players! If only we could get some players that don't age, then we will be set. What long term contracts? Baby bergie got his buyouts on entry anyways, it had no effect long term. Are you still whining about kaberle?
It's funny because Cunny was gone after his season but our current coach not only remains but is getting his friends in on the scam as well. Does Bergevin plan to tank next season too? Maybe Bergie can keep his tank going with Galchenyuk on the 2nd line again.
If you apply the intangibles BS to Gauthier it means you apply the BS to Bergevin. It's like saying Bergevin acquired Gonchar to help the young D's game out or Briere's playoff experience helped out Habs playoff push or Prust helping Gallagher/Galchenyuk's development or whatever new BS they're coming up with nowadays.
I think you're confusing something, I think both GMs suck. Where in my post did I give props to Bergevin for getting a rental Vanek and letting him go for nothing? I'm actually mocking Bergevin AND Gauthier. Neither tanked on purpose, I just can't help but see some of the double standard people have with defending Gauthier/Bergevin. Neither accomplished anything and made conference finals off the back of players drafted/acquired through Gainey...which is sad since he gave away Riberio for nothing, lost Streit/Souray/Kovalev/Koivu for nothing, and made one of the worst trades in this era McDo/Higgins for Gomez. When you're a GM who is living off a core built by a GM who made that many errors, you know you aren't good at your job.