WarriorofTime
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 29,369
- 17,674
Moved down 18 spots in the all-important fifth round for 23 games of Beauvillier. Completely unacceptable. Fire everyone.
That’s called the plan. I know KD got rid of your two boys but come on.They went into the season with guys like Reese Johnson making the opening night roster.
It was never about injuries.
They lacked depth from the start.
If by poor planning you mean a bunch of forwards injuries and Perry doing whatever he did.They should have never had to trade for Beauvillier in the first place. They only did because of poor planning.
It was also never about winning. How many forwards played games for the hawks prior to having to make a move?They went into the season with guys like Reese Johnson making the opening night roster.
It was never about injuries.
They lacked depth from the start.
The 5th becomes a 6th if the Nashville HF forum takes Musto off the Hawks forum.Thank you Trots, it's good old connection time.
So the Hawks gave a conditional 5th to get him, what was the condition?
Not understanding how filling a hole with a veteran due to unexpected rash of injuries without either rushing a kid or bringing up someone you wanted the kids on the hogs playing with.KD loses on the Beauvilkier moves..
To get him we gave Vancouver tge highest (best) of any 5th rounder we have at 2924 Draft = our own 5th =#129 (or maybe #130 if we finish 2nd last to SJ)..ie. very top of 4th roubd..
Se ding Beauvillier to Nashville we get a puck approx #147 (they currently arex13th best team i NHL(..IF they get to WCFibal that pick is worse...=at end of 5yh roubd.
Worst case:Beauvillier r costs us 30-31 positions if Nashville wins Cup or "just 28-29 positions if they get to WCFinal and lose ...
Or best case is that the pick is about #147 if they stay 13th best after playoffs.
So yes we getcax5th back but much later than had we not gotten Beauvilliier in the first place.
Best Hawks 5th ever=Andrew Saw taken at #139 ...We coukd have had #129 -#130 had KD never bothered to get Beauvillier...
BUT maybe KF will packagecthe Nash 5th with a pkayer ...retain and get a 2ndvorc3rd back?
T.Jonnso × Nashville 5th for a conditional 2nd (becomes 3rd ) if team we trade Johnson to does notcadvancecto WC Final) sonetging likevthat?
Not a good strategy to trade picks when you're rebuilding because you didn't plan properlyIt was also never about winning. How many forwards played games for the hawks prior to having to make a move?
Musto, what would have been a good plan?Not a good strategy to trade picks when you're rebuilding because you didn't plan properly
C’mon now, Clearly Musto’s plan would be to have 14 NHL level forwards in Chicago and 10 more NHL level forwards in Rockford.Musto, what would have been a good plan?
R. Johnson was like a 15th forward coming out of the offseason.They went into the season with guys like Reese Johnson making the opening night roster.
It was never about injuries.
They lacked depth from the start.
From second city hockeyNot a good strategy to trade picks when you're rebuilding because you didn't plan properly
He wasn’t the main piece. The isles first was the main piece.I have to say he was quite disappointing. He was the main piece in the Horvat trade and apparently didn't fit in to the Nuck's plan either. He was given an opp here and didn't do anything with it....so we got a body when we needed one, got some games and get a slightly worse pick without retaining any salary.....works for me.
Oh and by the way…he freed up $4.1 million in cap space…BOOM…no one had mentioned that yet, no rention, no ‘third team’ needed…pretty good deal actuallyMoved down 18 spots in the all-important fifth round for 23 games of Beauvillier. Completely unacceptable. Fire everyone.
C’mon Kev! You can’t be this backward. It’s a 5th rd pick.Not a good strategy to trade picks when you're rebuilding because you didn't plan properly