Laine hype train has slowed down, he hasn't looked very good this season in all honesty.Has Laineux posted in this thread yet? I'm honestly interested in hearing his take.
I think the word generational is used too often. We say Connor is generational because he was called that as a young player growing up, I think it was the worst thing to happen to him, and it doesn't even make it true. I really can't say who or what is generational, but the Orr's, Howe's, Mario's, Gretz's, Roy's, and maybe Sids of the world seem like they were, I feel it was more slapped on Connor. I still love him though!
Would it be such a bad thing to let Matthews just play hockey without these crazy burdens to carry around by his fanbase?
Agreed. I'm not even sure McDavid is generational yet, let alone anyone else mentioned. To me Lemieux and arguably Jagr are the last generational players to play the game.
Would it be such a bad thing to let Matthews just play hockey without these crazy burdens to carry around by his fanbase?
You can't seriously be obtuse enough to think Matthews actually cares or knows what HF users are saying about him, are you?
It's okay to admit that you simply just don't like reading about it because it makes you feel insecure/bothered about McDavid. Which is also ridiculous because McDavid is one hell of a ****ing player.
It's hard to conclusively identify a generational player during their time because you can't simply use the bar that separated generational players in previous generations.
Otherwise it'll be Gretzky, Orr and Lemieux until the end of time.
But just maybe that's all right now? Maybe we are still waiting for another?
The margin of their offensive dominance was off the charts, but they also played during offensive friendly eras.
Does their advantage compound in that kind of situation?
For example, normalized by era, Ovechkin's goal scoring is truly generational.
Pnep used to post the top goal scoring seasons normalized by goal scored in the league and he occupied a lot of those slots of best seasons of all-time.
He was only sharing his opinion. McdavidCrushedLarkin is a good poster, makes good points. I don't believe he feels that way at all...
To clarify, I wasn't calling him obtuse. Just the notion that our (Leaf fans) insane expectations are somehow going to be a burden to Matthews, which is ridiculous. Matthews is a grounded kid, he knows what is expected out of him, and also based on things he has said, it seems he expects even more out of himself.
I just don't see why some Oiler fans get so up in arms when the Matthews vs McDavid debate comes up. It's way too premature still, what we know is McDavid just potted 100+ points and cleaned up @ the awards in his sophomore season, yet some of them still act pretty insecure when it's brought up. Both are going to be incredible players, as of now you obviously have to predict McDavid stays the better player -- but it really isn't so crazy to think that Matthews could challenge him in some seasons.
Just wanted to clarify what I meant as it seemed like I was attacking that poster, which wasn't what I was trying to do.
Why do you assume Habs fans hate the Leafs ? neither team has won in a long time hopefully one of these years it happens for one of themI won't. I personally embrace the hate. I can read the jealousy that goes on with the other fanbases. Specially Habs fans.
Why do you assume Habs fans hate the Leafs ? neither team has won in a long time hopefully one of these years it happens for one of them
All of the noteworthy lists have him ranked as a top-10 player in the world.
One of the most knowledgeable coaches in the world has no issues praising him as a generational talent.
But the HFBoards experts still believe he's overrated and should get around 35 goals and 70 points this year.
I think says a lot about how serious people should take HF posters' opinions. It's generally just bias drivel, especially when it comes to Matthews.
He's probably the closest.If anyone is similar to Mario in the NHL it's Malkin.