blood gin
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2017
- 4,174
- 2,203
Did Bryan trottier have trottier's defensive abilities when he was 21?
Good question. Did he receive Selke votes in 77-78? I think he was good defensively from the getgo and just got better
Did Bryan trottier have trottier's defensive abilities when he was 21?
Good question. Did he receive Selke votes in 77-78? I think he was good defensively from the getgo and just got better
What does that have to do with Trottier or Potvin?
He did.
Nope.
Trottier received his first Selke votes in 80-81, age 24.
Only got Selke votes in 6 of his 18 seasons.
Keep in mind that selke votes were damn near impossible to get if you were not Gainey or Ramsay for the first few years. Ballots only had three names on them. Trottier could have been excellent defensively and still no one could have considered him top-3 in the league. Not saying you're wrong but the selke voting doesn't prove that you're right.
Since I only stated 3 facts, don't see how I could be wrong. Unless Hockey Reference is incorrect.
Correct me if I'm wrong. I thought your point was that he wasn't great defensively right from the start.
Tavares is probably the most similar in the way they both like to play within an arms reach of defenders and work in tight spaces around the net. They both rely on compete level and IQ more so than skills. Tavares spends more time behind the net though, where as Matthews hangs out in front of the net.
His combination size, unique release and appreciation of off-the-puck passing lanes makes him a difficult comparison historically. Centers typically aren't such goal-heavy scorers.
Mathews at 21 does not have an eraser defenceman of Potvin's quality watching his back like Trottier did at 21.
I agree with most of what you're saying except this.To be honest, I have very high hopes and I'd be rather disappointed with a LeCavalier Stamkos hybrid, a Sundin or a Tavares. Sakic caliber would satisfy me.
His long-term offensive abilities following that magical age 21 to 24 goal-scoring Peak that Elite and or generational players tend to have, is difficult to project. But I think that we may be looking at something in the Joe sakic or Steve Yzerman or Bryan trottier range.I'm not quite sure how mature trottier's game was at a very young age, but I think Matthews is more mature than Sakic or Yzerman at the same age. He really has that feel of "a player you win with".
I agree with most of what you're saying except this.
In Sakic's 20 yr old season, he put up 102 points (40 more than 2nd on the team, and 57 more than 3rd) on a team that went 12-61-7. He pretty much was already at his best by his second year in the league.
He was a great man on and off the ice.Nelson Mandela
Fair enough, for what it's worth, I feel both Joe and Matthews were both very mature players early on in their careers from a development standpoint.you are bringing up the point that he was on a terrible team as though it hurt him for putting up high point point totals when it actually could be the exact opposite. It cuts both ways in those cases, on one hand he had no one good to play with, on the other hand, every team scores some goals, and if he's the only one who can...
I'm not saying that the answer lies on one side of the equation or the other, only that as it applies to auston Matthews, it's really hard to compare at that stage because in Auston's age 20 season he was on a very good team with plenty of other offensive options and his power play Ice time was inexplicably limited while he was the best even-strength scorer in the league.
Matthews is a really really hard player to find a comparable for. So few centres score more goals than assists to begin with that you don't start with many options.
From players I've seen, I keep coming back to Malkin for the sheer explosive skill coupled with size in the middle of the ice.