Quick thoughts -
With a top 4 of:
Nicklas Lidstrom - Earl Seibert
Ken Reardon - Jack Stewart
My instinct is to put Seibert on the second pair to give it some offense and provide stronger match up ability. Stewart is a #2 in this draft and would not be out of place playing on the top pair (and in fact seems like a good style match for him).
Thoughts?
Remind me, do we have accounts of Stewart on the right and Reardon on the left? Because the original roster post has them flipped by handedness, and the proposed change would unite two righties and two lefties.
My perrrrrrrsonal preference would actually to have a shutdown pair of Stewart-Seibert, and then have Lidstrom drag around Reardon because I'd trust Nick with anyone, but I don't think most voters would see it that way.
I found a good bit of Stewart on the right (going to make a bio). Played with Quackenbush who played almost exclusively left.Remind me, do we have accounts of Stewart on the right and Reardon on the left? Because the original roster post has them flipped by handedness, and the proposed change would unite two righties and two lefties.
My perrrrrrrsonal preference would actually to have a shutdown pair of Stewart-Seibert, and then have Lidstrom drag around Reardon because I'd trust Nick with anyone, but I don't think most voters would see it that way.
Good to know. I’ve had both of those players in the past, but there are 1000 players in a big ATD year and I only have so much hard drive space upstairs, haha. I think the proposed change works in that case.I found a good bit of Stewart on the right (going to make a bio). Played with Quackenbush who played almost exclusively left.
Reardon was on a pair with Bouchard for awhile, who was a RHS. Pretty confident he's left based on that but don't have a ton of quotes on him yet. If I have time I'll expand that too.
Why did I think otherwise? Never mind, back to the coffee pot.Reardon is a left handed shot.
I currently switched him to be with Seibert, so that should cover any questions with being too slow I'd hope.Whichever pairing Reardon is on is going to be attacked for being slow, so make sure his partner can skate decently well.
I don't recall Stewart's skating
Whichever pairing Reardon is on is going to be attacked for being slow, so make sure his partner can skate decently well.
I don't recall Stewart's skating
Siebert can absolutely skate and was a very strong 2 way guy. I'd definitely put him, a RHS, to the right of Reardon and Stewart up on the top pairing with Lidstrom given we know Black Jack played the right side with Quack.
On the other side - I challenge you to find a better pure defensive pairing than Lidstrom-Stewart.That works. Ideally you'd have a partner for Lidstrom who could put up some points at even strength, but it isn't strictly necessary.
On the other side - I challenge you to find a better pure defensive pairing than Lidstrom-Stewart.
I'll look forward to debating that with you if it comes to it.Ivan Johnson - Harvey
How should I work my top four D?
Borje Salming - Art Coulter (A)
Scott Niedermayer (A) - Sylvio Mantha
On the other side - I challenge you to find a better pure defensive pairing than Lidstrom-Stewart.
BTW RD and LD should be two different positions. So f***ing confusing.The way you have it written is probably the best setup
Best rushing guy + best stay at homer
2nd best rushing guy + 2nd best stay at homer
Minus a few points because Niedermayer generally played RD, but as a LHS, I'd think he could transition better than Coulter or Mantha.
Why am I finding a ton of articles calling him "Galloping Ken Reardon"?Whichever pairing Reardon is on is going to be attacked for being slow, so make sure his partner can skate decently well.
I don't recall Stewart's skating
Why am I finding a ton of articles calling him "Galloping Ken Reardon"?
Ton = two, but I'm still early in the research, so that's surprising me.
From what I'm gathering now, he liked to chirp in the press a lot (to the point where he was fined $1000 one time). Wondering if that's one of those things that kind of took a life of its own.I don't know. I haven't researched the player thoroughly, but every retrospective on Reardon includes his own quote: "I couldn't skate, I couldn't shoot, and I wasn't very intelligent. But I was spectacular"
I would say that for a pro hockey player, even one 75 years ago, being described as "galloping" and one who, by his own assessment "couldn't skate", coalesces for me into a picture of a guy who gives it his all to get where he's going, but has a stride that would make a scout cringe to look at.I don't know. I haven't researched the player thoroughly, but every retrospective on Reardon includes his own quote: "I couldn't skate, I couldn't shoot, and I wasn't very intelligent. But I was spectacular"
Not quite sure I agree with your assessment of what "galloping" means, but I agree that I have more work to do before I can say definitively whether his skating is a negative or not.I would say that for a pro hockey player, even one 75 years ago, being described as "galloping" and one who, by his own assessment "couldn't skate", coalesces for me into a picture of a guy who gives it his all to get where he's going, but has a stride that would make a scout cringe to look at.
And I think you'd come up with more instances on the ice where a defenseman who has to turn quickly to pick up a guy, than you would where he would "gallop" up the ice, so his skating is still an issue you've got mitigate.
A few more quotes (or better, video) would clarify that assumption I'm making.