Howell-Reinhart vs Hall-Egan
Big advantage for Vancouver. Harry Howell is by far the best play on either of these pairings!
Howell's Norris Voting record: 1st, 5th
Howell's Hart Voting record: 5th
Howell was the last guy to win a Norris trophy before Orr started dominating. The guy is an elite defensive defenseman, here are some anectodes:
Howell is superior to Joe Hall, and Reinhart and Egan are in the same tier. However, Reinhart was extremely gifted offensively, and benefits from having such a great defensive defenseman like Howell to cover for him defensively. It'll help him be as effective as possible. The Egan-Hall pairing doesn't really make either of them more effective, and seems to be an imbalanced pairing. Also, both these guys took a lot of penalties, and that's very concerning. Most of the time, PIM doesn't just represent toughness, it represents a lack of control over emotions and a tendency to hook/grab/trip players you can't keep up with. How many penalties are these guys gonna take to try and keep up with Bure as he spins circles around them?
--------------
So Vancouver has a significant edge in net, and an edge on the blueline as well.
Now I'm going to post my new forward lines for home games, and then I'll analyze the forwards.
Yes, Howell is likely the best defencemen here. By How much, though?
I find it interesting that Howell only ever made 1 AST Team (granted, I don't have any multiple AST guys myself- though Hall never played in a league with them). Granted, he won a Norris trophy that year, and is the best here.
Again though, similar to Gardiner vs Ross:
-Hall is definetly tougher than Howell, who doesn't really seem well known for his toughness side of things (though his PIMs suggest some toughness.)
-I'm not sure if Howell is better offensively or not than Hall. Hall has a 4th and a 5th in NHL points (split-league era, granted) amongst defencemen of good significance, and seemed to have had three years of more good offense in the NHA. Hall also has some great playoff numbers, with 6 goals in 12 stanley cup games and 5 points in 4 NHA playoff games. Howell, from reading, doesn't sound like an offensive threat- though perhaps the stats indicate otherwise.
Howell, though, is definetly better defensively than Hall, and does bridge the gap in that sense. Hall, though, is no slouch, as I will indicate shortly.
-----------------------------------
I don't think Reinhart is in the same tier as Egan- at all. Reinhart never made an AST like Egan did, and was not nearly as good offensively as Egan was. Here is Egan's offensive record:
Points amongst defencemen- 12th (1941), 3rd(1942), 2nd(1944), 6th(1945), 4th(1946), 1st(1947), 6th(1948), 1st(1949), 10th(1950), 10th(1951)
Reinhart has some great years, but I don't think he really has the longevity to match something like this. (he likely played in a tougher era, but I still don't think that adjustment is a good as Egan's- unless HHH can provide the offensive numbers to show otherwise).
Reinhart was a strong playoff producer, but Egan wasn't a slouch either- 2nd in d-men playoff points from 1945-50 (quite a bit lower in PPG granted, but he played a lot more games than the guys ahead of him in that sense).
Egan was undoubtedly much tougher than Reinhart- Egan was one of the toughest defencemen of his era, Reinhart doesn't have a lot (to my knowledge) showing toughness. Reinhart was said to be capable of his own zone and may be a bit better in that sense than Egan, but neither is here to play defence well- and I think, especially with the large toughness gap, Egan has an edge over Reinhart. And, overall, I think the only edge the Maroons have on top-4, looking at positions, would be the left-side of second pairings (though it is a good edge).
As for your latter part- let's estabilish a few things:
1. Both players have quotes establishing toughness, particularly Hall. I've been attacked for this repeatdly and have posted quotes repeatedly, but as it seems the message isn't getting through, I'll post the defensive ability quotes again-
Hall:
The series proved to be everything hockeyists had hoped for, brilliant scoring and strong defense. Joe Hall was in an especially surly mood, making full use of his complement of defensive tactics-hobokin.net
Some accounts of his play from the globe and mail:
Quote:
In the final session Ottawa started fast, but Vezina, Hall and Corbeau stood firm in the face of bombardment- Jan 31, 1918
Quote:
Joe Hall, just out of the clutches of the Toronto police, drew down the only major foul of the night when he tripped Cy Denneny and saved a probable goal in the third period. -Jan 31, 1918
Quote:
Hall and Corbeau played nice defence hockey, but they were outplayed and outguessed by the Toronto forwards.- March 12, 1918
Quote:
Corbeau relieved the situation by making several clever rushes, and Hall was also prominent with his blocking. -december 24, 1918
Not the only quotes on Hall out there in the globe and mail likely, though I haven't had a lot of time to check more.
One quote on Egan, though he likely lacks defensive at this level:
Egan’s defensive play was as impressive as his sniping. He tossed out half a dozen jolts, far above par in this season of the “Vanished Body Checkâ€. His blocking on the Metz-Hamilton breakaway was the high defensive spot of the night. Not only did Blackie Pat take care of Nick, but he wound up with the puck. -Globe and Mail, February 4, 1946
These quotes show they had some defensive ability, particularly Hall, who seemed pretty good defensively. And he also seemed to be able to take timely penalties too, such as when he tripped Denneny to save a goal. They aren't going to win awards defensively, but with Hall, I think they can be adequate- especially against a much more defensive-minded team.
As for the notion they are going to take penalties- sure they will, but every team has players like that. Howell, with 3 top 10's in PIMs, seems to have taken a fair amount of penalties himself, for example. I don't think my team is too overbearing in penalties, and frankly, your powerplay isn't really threatening anyway.
As for the notion that Bure of skating circles around them, Egan was known as a good skater himself. And with either Ramsay or Joliat likely on him most of the time (although more on that when you do get your lines sorted out), I am not too concerned about him or his speed. Plus, Hall is a fantastic last line of defense against Bure, too. As for how many penalties are they going to take with him around? Well, with the forwards I intend to have on Bure, not too bad or abnormal to what they normally did. They likely will take seom penalties though- but then, how will Bure stand up to the physical punishment these two can dish out on him?