NYIsles1*
Guest
Considering this is Larry Brooks paper they should have some more detailed facts for his pro-NHLPA stance.
To list the Rangers had the sixth highest NHL payroll at 105 million has never been reported and makes little sense. Also in this article it's claimed the Ranger revenue is 90 million on ticket sales, then changes it to 90 million total revenue which seems correct.
Different than Forbes estimate which was much higher.
http://nypost.com/business/39660.htm
GARDEN'S NHL
In addition to the $90 million in total revenue the Rangers reported to the NHL, the perennial losers told the league that they lost $34 million in the 2003-04 season.
To list the Rangers had the sixth highest NHL payroll at 105 million has never been reported and makes little sense. Also in this article it's claimed the Ranger revenue is 90 million on ticket sales, then changes it to 90 million total revenue which seems correct.
Different than Forbes estimate which was much higher.
http://nypost.com/business/39660.htm
GARDEN'S NHL
In addition to the $90 million in total revenue the Rangers reported to the NHL, the perennial losers told the league that they lost $34 million in the 2003-04 season.