Smart money is on him getting exactly 5 games. Or to put it another way, a 2 week unpaid vacation before the start of playoffs.
Well know as soon as we find out what hearing it is. The guy is a wreckless punk. He JUST speared JD and I would assume damaged his ribs. He's a danger on the ice that uses his stick as a weapon
Who is JD? And did Keith get suspended for this spear?
I think the League will avoid 5 games because of the attention that number would draw. 4 or 6.
Should be a lot more.
What? lol. 5 games would draw more attention than 6? I think I see where you're getting at here, but what attention is the league afraid of getting at? Suspending a player for too long because he deliberately swung his stick at someone's face? The league shouldn't be afraid of anything except another offense like this and possibly a serious injury because it didn't send a firm message across the league by not suspending players like Keith for a sufficient number of games.
What? lol. 5 games would draw more attention than 6? I think I see where you're getting at here, but what attention is the league afraid of getting at? Suspending a player for too long because he deliberately swung his stick at someone's face? The league shouldn't be afraid of anything except another offense like this and possibly a serious injury because it didn't send a firm message across the league by not suspending players like Keith for a sufficient number of games.
I stand by that. Suspend him for 5 games and the overwhelming perception will be it was chosen so that he wouldn't miss playoff games and it will be seen as toothless. The League cares more about perception than actually handing out meaningful suspensions.
I think that things like this should be looking at 20+ games. They, quite rightly, protect referees, but players should be offered the same protection for plays that have got nothing to do with hockey.
Well know as soon as we find out what hearing it is. The guy is a wreckless punk. He JUST speared Johnny Gaudreau and I would assume damaged his ribs. He's a danger on the ice that uses his stick as a weapon
Can't that be considered assault.....
I stand by that. Suspend him for 5 games and the overwhelming perception will be it was chosen so that he wouldn't miss playoff games and it will be seen as toothless. The League cares more about perception than actually handing out meaningful suspensions.
I think that things like this should be looking at 20+ games. They, quite rightly, protect referees, but players should be offered the same protection for plays that have got nothing to do with hockey.
Any idea what time that happened in game (period etc.)? I would like to see it, didnt find video about that.
Any idea what time that happened in game (period etc.)? I would like to see it, didnt find video about that.
ic, to be fair though...anybody within 10 ft of Keith should expect stick work from himBattery, not assault since Coyle didn't expect it.
Well know as soon as we find out what hearing it is. The guy is a wreckless punk. He JUST speared Johnny Gaudreau and I would assume damaged his ribs. He's a danger on the ice that uses his stick as a weapon
@Dbrownss I ment Johnny Gaudreau - Duncan Keith case. I assume it was game 26.3.2016, so couple days ago.