Ducks down 2 with 6 to go in the 2nd. Only six shots what the hell happened to this team?
Post 893, imo.
Ducks down 2 with 6 to go in the 2nd. Only six shots what the hell happened to this team?
We broke them mentally in the PO's.
No human can mentally take he beating the Hawks out on their team
No human can mentally take he beating the Hawks out on their team
Real dirty play by Buff. Trips Pomonville, then slams him into the boards while he was defenseless.
I was watching that game, that was dumb. Some of you know that's my pet peeve, i really hate that, Everyday i hear many say it's hockey but i think it's bullcrap.
When i played (ages ago) i was clean and knew if i dished it out i would have to deal with it. Some years ago there was an incident here in N.E. IL where a player was paralyzed by another after a dangerous hit and that family supposedly filed suit.
Ever heard of responsibility?
if I knew how to embed tweets into this I would, but I thought it looked in on replay.
Look at this
https://twitter.com/ReiterNathan/status/658495861924626432
That image is so blurry I just can't tell for sure. Certainly looks in, though.
Thought it was the right call at first but looked at it again and that puck was in.
They can't use angles from the middle of the ice, because it causes an illusion that the puck went in. Called the Parallax Angle...Agree with everyone here. Puck looked like it was in but nothing definitive that you can overturn. If it was called a goal on the ice it, it would have stood as well. Tough break.
Paralax angle only is in play if the puck if off the ice surface is what I was told. There are multiple other posts and angles that show the puck was clearly in, including a goal line photo, and a vine from the SN feed.
Paralax angle only is in play if the puck if off the ice surface is what I was told. There are multiple other posts and angles that show the puck was clearly in, including a goal line photo, and a vine from the SN feed.