Are the Toronto Maple Leafs Stanley Cup contenders?

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
34,240
54,104
Weegartown
Yes or no and also if you want why?

Leafs are in year #8 of Auston Matthews and Mitch Marner. Year #6 of prized UFA signing John Tavares. Since the beginning of the 2019-20 season they have the 4th most points of any team in the NHL. Those kind of results speak for themselves, Toronto clearly has a very good hockey team. But are they capable of winning the ultimate prize?
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
36,075
16,515
I don't see how adding Domi and Bertuzzi were the moves they needed to put them over the top.

The only way you'd say they have a chance is under the assumption that they make a substantial move or two at the deadline
 

Leaf Fans

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
20,017
8,504
Yes or no and also if you want why?

Leafs are in year #8 of Auston Matthews and Mitch Marner. Year #6 of prized UFA signing John Tavares. Since the beginning of the 2019-20 season they have the 4th most points of any team in the NHL. Those kind of results speak for themselves, Toronto clearly has a very good hockey team. But are they capable of winning the ultimate prize?
Not at the moment. It is only January - they haven't even made the playoffs yet.
 

BraveCanadian

Registered User
Jun 30, 2010
14,751
3,670
No.

I made the post in the main GDT, but this past game only 2 of the 6 goals were bad/should have been stopped. The d f***ed up on more.

Toronto's defensive system is bad. The d-core is bad.

Agreed. But some nerds say the expected goals were only 2.. obviously they didn't watch the game.

Sammy definitely should have had 2 of them, but on the others when you leave guys wide open in front for gimmes.. you're gonna get scored on.
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
29,559
31,108
Agreed. But some nerds say the expected goals were only 2.. obviously they didn't watch the game.

Sammy definitely should have had 2 of them, but on the others when you leave guys wide open in front for gimmes.. you're gonna get scored on.
The tying goal at 5 id say yes, but honestly the way he curled and dragged that puck and shot it through McCabes legs... thats a maybe.

The bad line change that lead to a 3 on 1, but Samsonov made the save, but lost sight of the puck. That's baaaaaad.

Maybe they meant he was only expected to save 2 of the goals against ?

I hope that's the case as that stat is another advanced stat that's pointless to have as it can be easily dismissed as faulty.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad