Feel less bad about NHL's ESPN+ exclusive games now.
Here's what should happen in the TV deals from 2029 onward:
Sunday afternoon: National game on ABC (starting third week of May)
Sunday night: ESPN
Monday night: Apple TV+
Tuesday night: TBS
Wednesday night: Peacock
Thursday night: MLB Network
Friday night: Paramount Network (produced by CBS Sports, which Paramount Network should acquire more high-profile sports that are too prestigious to air on CBSSN)
Saturday afternoon: Fox Sports 1 (doubleheaders until CFB season begins, singleheaders in September)
Saturday night: 4 regional games on Fox
All games on cable outlets (except Sunday nights on ESPN) would be non-exclusive and be blacked out in the home territories of the participating teams.
Lockout proved owners (at least mot of them) does not care about the future of baseball.I love how they have all these exclusivities now and still charge something like MLB.TV 120 for a full season. You lose games, you have to be a subscriber to those other networks that have the games, and it's a lot more inconvenient for the consumer just to know where to look for said game. I guess this was the logical conclusion to the Cord Cutting craze, but for a league desperate to gain fans, this might just turn fans off of the league.
Why would one ever get MLB.TV now, especially with that service being inferior than it used to be.
Way too many different networks.
I've proposed a realignment into 4 leagues based on history. And every cable network listed is gonna be needed for the playoffs. The four controlled by a major media conglomerate (FS1, PN, ESPN, TBS) would be assigned one league for each of the first two rounds of my new postseason format.
And besides, having every big 5 media conglomerate (including NBCUniversal through Peacock) broadcast MLB games either on linear TV or streaming would make MLB unique in that regard. NFL only has four of those conglomerates broadcasting games, all but Warner Bros.-Discovery.
Now if Amazon were to acquire in the future the soon-to-be-formed Warner Bros.-Discovery, they could move some of the Thursday Night Football package to perhaps TruTV, and Seattle-based Amazon's sports broadcasting division would become the West Coast branch of Turner Sports (otherwise based in Atlanta). This would make the NFL have all big 5 media conglomerates in their pocket too.
For any league, being able to broadcast on outlets owned by every single media conglomerate in the Big 5 would be a big deal.
Right now, the NBA and NHL have only two these conglomerates in their fold - both have deals with Disney and WB-Discovery.
The NBA's media deals are up for renewal in 2025. They could enter the streaming market at that point, perhaps using NBCUniversal's Peacock. In addition, ABC, ESPN, and TNT would continue to broadcast games, but now I propose ABC would now only broadcast regular season games on Sunday afternoons and have a portion of the Christmas slate, with the Saturday night games moving to CBS, who also airs a portion of the Christmas schedule. ABC and CBS would alternate the NBA Finals, and CBS and Turner would co-produce all games airing on CBS and TNT (similar to March Madness), using TNT's theme. In addition to NBCUniversal, this would also add Paramount Global to the NBA fold.
I should've quit reading here.Now if Amazon were to acquire in the future the soon-to-be-formed Warner Bros.-Discovery, they could move some of the Thursday Night Football package to perhaps TruTV, and Seattle-based Amazon's sports broadcasting division would become the West Coast branch of Turner Sports (otherwise based in Atlanta).
I'm not. Streaming is becoming more of a viable option for live sports. There's no turning back now.Are you just anti consumer?
I'm not. Streaming is becoming more of a viable option for live sports. There's no turning back now.
I'm only proposing two streaming services - Apple TV and Peacock - be part of MLB's TV partners from 2029 onward, the same two that will be streaming MLB games starting this season through 2028. All other TV partners are linear TV networks - the in-house MLB Network and at least one network owned by every media conglomerate but NBCUniversal (which has their MLB rights through Peacock).Not for the consumer if you have to pay for 4 different ones....
I'm only proposing two streaming services - Apple TV and Peacock - be part of MLB's TV partners from 2029 onward, the same two that will be streaming MLB games starting this season through 2028. All other TV partners are linear TV networks - the in-house MLB Network and at least one network owned by every media conglomerate but NBCUniversal (which has their MLB rights through Peacock).
Remember when RSN's and Cable Companies were the bad guys and streaming was going to liberate everybody?
I have no idea what MLB is thinking, zero chance i ever sign up for apple tv to watch a couple baseball games a week. I will be pirating those games