arent you just giving him to vegas ? that's nice of you.
who of jarry and desmith is favorite for call up?
I know he is bad but have you seen their ahl goalie ? they are as bad in the ahl.Vegas is gonna wish Niemi was under warranty in the near future, I think.
I know he is bad but have you seen their ahl goalie ? they are as bad in the ahl.
Yeah, back then he was 5.75m worth of chewed ass.
I would point out though that Rutherford's actions suggest he was happier with the situation than he sounds there i.e. no trading him away.
Reading JR's comments in the athletic article I'm going to guess its going to be Desmith that gets called up.
Want to provide any quotes?
"They're both goaltenders that we like a lot," Rutherford told The Athletic on Monday afternoon. "Jarry's the guy that has been next in line and we like him a lot. But DeSmith has played very well. So, we have some decisions to make here. But remember, nothing is set in stone."
Thanks for the memories Niemi. I look forward to seeing your videotribute.
That's obviously not what Yohe was saying
Yohe was saying "see how bad Niemi is? That's what the Penguins would have had if they would have traded Fleury last year". If you really think Yohe thinks about his tweets so much to say "if the Penguins would have traded Fleury, it would have had to be for Niemi", I don't know what to tell you. He just makes snide remarks randomly. He doesn't think enough and isn't smart enough with hockey to know that if the Penguins would have had to take back a guy like Niemi to trade Fleury.
I just hope their tribute video tops the Plotnikov tribute video:
That is absolutely unnecessary for him to prove his NHL readiness. He proved it last year. He doesn't need to prove last year "wasn't a fluke". He has already proven he's a NHL caliber goalie.
Its called context. This is EXACTLY what the downside of trading Fleury last season was. This situation is EXACTLY the reason he didnt want to move Fleury in season.
I have no idea why thats hard to grasp.
Its called context. This is EXACTLY what the downside of trading Fleury last season was. This situation is EXACTLY the reason he didnt want to move Fleury in season.
I have no idea why thats hard to grasp.
Without Fleury we do not win the cup.
That said it is a stretch to connect Niemi sucking this badly with that situation. Remember that the Pens had Condon, who was a ton better and may have done as well as Fleury in the playoffs. It was not Fleury or giving up 8 goals a game in the playoffs.
Because you're twisting something he said into something he clearly didn't say by adding baseless assumptions.
It's very easy to read what Yohe wrote. He literally just said "good thing the Penguins kept Fleury, because Niemi sucks". There's no "context" here, you're creating the context to try and rationalize it. It's just another snide remark by Yohe, you're severely overestimating how deep he was thinking if you think he meant "good thing the Penguins didn't trade Fleury, because they would have traded him for Niemi and Niemi sucks". Niemi sucking is irrelevant from this situation, it's just Yohe being an idiot.
Exactly the point I'm making. Keeping Fleury was a good decision because the Penguins won a cup last year with Fleury playing in a pretty significant role. Niemi sucking this year doesn't add more validation to keeping Fleury last year though, which is what Yohe is trying to say here.
I don't even know what prompted his comment anyway. No one is complaining that the Penguins kept Fleury throughout all of last year. That tweet would have made sense when Fleury got the game 7 shutout against the Capitals, but now? Who thinks the decision was a bad one at this point?