Proposal: Ana-Dal

AngelDuck

Rak 'em up
Jun 16, 2012
23,194
16,819
Not enough for Anaheim. That’s a late first, a decent roster player and a cap dump with negative value. No thanks. Anaheim should be looking to move with Buffalo or Edmonton and pray their 1st round pick ends up a lottery
 

Boo Boo

Registered User
Jan 31, 2013
2,137
2,262
this is a bit of an awkward fit. we dont really need faksa, and for rakell we would need either a higher pick than dallas's first or for dallas to attach a good prospect alongside it. The Cogs dump is a little ehhh for us but id take him back in the right deal since his contract is over after this season?

Any chance harley, cogs and a pick for rakell +? im bad with values so someone else could probably take it from here
 

Boo Boo

Registered User
Jan 31, 2013
2,137
2,262
Not enough for Anaheim. That’s a late first, a decent roster player and a cap dump with negative value. No thanks. Anaheim should be looking to move with Buffalo or Edmonton and pray their 1st round pick ends up a lottery

theres gotta be no way teams are going to trade unprotected firsts after the last 2 seasons. I also dont think its reasonable to try to snipe firsts like that. Its way more likely to backfire imo
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
40,398
35,732
I imagine price would be a bit higher... lot of teams would love to add Rakell and drop a player off.
Ducks could even retain and make Rakell more appealing during the flat cap.


Not sure what could be added or swapped for faska
 

Spazkat

Registered User
Feb 19, 2015
4,361
2,277
Given what we're seeing in terms of contracts being handed out so far this year, I think that Rakell contract is going to hold a TON of value should Anaheim entertain the idea of trading him
 

Ducks in a row

Go Ducks Quack Quack
Dec 17, 2013
18,010
4,368
U.S.A.
no-gif-baby-duck-saying-no-duckling-falling-asleep.gif
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
Not enough for Anaheim. That’s a late first, a decent roster player and a cap dump with negative value. No thanks. Anaheim should be looking to move with Buffalo or Edmonton and pray their 1st round pick ends up a lottery

lol. Buffalo isnt giving up a potential lotto pick for Rakell
 

Djp

Registered User
Jul 28, 2012
23,941
5,673
Alexandria, VA
Not enough for Anaheim. That’s a late first, a decent roster player and a cap dump with negative value. No thanks. Anaheim should be looking to move with Buffalo or Edmonton and pray their 1st round pick ends up a lottery

Buffalo Edmonton or any team will protect the 1st.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ivanlwan

Djp

Registered User
Jul 28, 2012
23,941
5,673
Alexandria, VA
Given what we're seeing in terms of contracts being handed out so far this year, I think that Rakell contract is going to hold a TON of value should Anaheim entertain the idea of trading him


Now st full value....no

Wait till deadline and retain max making him free to acquitimg team for 2021 and reduced in 2122. You would likely get a 1st from a playoff team + 2 prospects ( not top 3)
 

anezthes

Registered User
Mar 20, 2014
4,462
2,484
To Anaheim: Faksa, Dal 1st 2021 and Cogliano (Cap dump)

To Dallas: Rakell

No, thanks. Faksa isn't enticing at all, and the 1st will likely be late. Add a cap dump on top and you're not offering much of value.

Bourque, Harley, Dellandrea or Robertson would have to be involved IMO.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad