All-Time A-H Team v. All-Time I-Z Team

kmad

riot survivor
Jun 16, 2003
34,133
62
Vancouver
Bobby Hull - Wayne Gretzky - Gordie Howe
Phil Esposito - Jean Beliveau - Mike Bossy
Bill Cook - Bobby Clarke - Brett Hull
Charlie Conacher - Syl Apps - Bernie Geoffrion
 

Gobias Industries

Registered User
Aug 29, 2007
12,042
31
Toronto
Best line for A-H:

Hull-Gretzky-Howe
Harvey-Bourque

Best line for I-Z

Ovechkin/Kharlamov-Lemieux-Richard
Orr-Shore
 
Last edited:

Hawkey Town 18

Registered User
Jun 29, 2009
8,253
1,647
Chicago, IL
A-H
Bobby Hull - Gretzky - Howe
Esposito - Beliveau - Bossy
Conacher - Clarke - Cook
Bathgate - Apps - Geoffrion
Boucher

Harvey - Bourque
Coffey - Fetisov
Chelios - Clancy
Horton

Hasek
Brodeur
Hall


I-Z
Messier - Lemieux - M. Richard
Lindsay - Morenz - Jagr
Kharlamov - Mikita - Lafleur
Sakic - Trottier - Makarov
Schmidt


Orr - Lidstrom
Shore - Potvin
Kelly - Robinson
Taylor

Roy
Plante
Sawchuk


The I-Z Team seems better to me, which makes sense since they have way more of the alphabet to select players from. What was the reason for making H/I the cutoff?

EDIT: Originally had Schmidt at 4th line RW and Yzerman as an extra, then substituted Makarov
 
Last edited:

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
18,147
12,830
A-H
Hull Gretzky Howe
Esposito Beliveau Bossy
Apps Clarke Cook
Conacher Dionne Bathgate

Harvey Bourque
Fetisov Coffey
Chelios Clancy

Hasek

I-Z
Lindsay Lemieux Richard
Kharlamov Mikita Jagr
Messier Morenz Lafleur
Mahovlich Yzerman Makarov

Orr Lidstrom
Shore Potvin
Kelly Robinson

Roy

Forwards might be pretty close with A-H having more high end talent but I-Z having more depth. I-Z have far better defenceman, as you could argue that the sixth best defenceman on that team is better than the third best on A-H. I would give A-H the goaltending edge, but overall I think I-Z is clearly better.
 

Hawkey Town 18

Registered User
Jun 29, 2009
8,253
1,647
Chicago, IL
A-H
Hull Gretzky Howe
Esposito Beliveau Bossy
Apps Clarke Cook
Conacher Dionne Bathgate

Harvey Bourque
Fetisov Coffey
Chelios Clancy

Hasek

I-Z
Lindsay Lemieux Richard
Kharlamov Mikita Jagr
Messier Morenz Lafleur
Mahovlich Yzerman Makarov

Orr Lidstrom
Shore Potvin
Kelly Robinson

Roy

Forwards might be pretty close with A-H having more high end talent but I-Z having more depth. I-Z have far better defenceman, as you could argue that the sixth best defenceman on that team is better than the third best on A-H. I would give A-H the goaltending edge, but overall I think I-Z is clearly better.

I like the Makarov pick. I think I'm going to have to edit my team
 

Derick*

Guest
I thought because H is such a valuable number and in general the earlier letter have more people that would be the fairest way to split it.

New question: which splitting point produces the most even teams H-I? K-L? L-M?
 

Hawkey Town 18

Registered User
Jun 29, 2009
8,253
1,647
Chicago, IL
I thought because H is such a valuable number and in general the earlier letter have more people that would be the fairest way to split it.

New question: which splitting point produces the most even teams H-I? K-L? L-M?

Adding K to the first team would make them closer. I think L is the letter that's the tipping point. That would send Lemieux, Lafleur, Lidstrom to the other team (Kharlamov would already be there). The question is, are the teams most even with the L's on the first team or the second?
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
18,147
12,830
Adding K to the first team would make them closer. I think L is the letter that's the tipping point. That would send Lemieux, Lafleur, Lidstrom to the other team (Kharlamov would already be there). The question is, are the teams most even with the L's on the first team or the second?

I agree with this. A-L would be too dominant. A-K would give the first team a much needed left wing in Kharlamov, a much needed defenceman in Kelly and another great scorer in Jagr.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad