Fistfullofbeer
Moderator
I only see Kevin Kurz report it and have not seen terms of this deal on Capfriendly. Could it be an ELC? I know True signed a 2 year deal with the Cuda last year.
Also, do you still like this guy @The Nemesis ?
I only see Kevin Kurz report it and have not seen terms of this deal on Capfriendly. Could it be an ELC? I know True signed a 2 year deal with the Cuda last year.
Also, do you still like this guy @The Nemesis ?
A little less than I did coming out of the WHL becuase he didn't have a great season, production wise (though 15 goals for a bottom 6 guy is pretty solid).
But I still think he has the tool-set to be a good 4th liner with emergency 3rd line ability.
Well Taco Charlton from the Dallas cowboys got a sponsorship from a restaurant called Taco Bueno. Different sport but.....money is money.Would a sponsorship from True hockey be too on the nose for him?
With a lay-up name like that, disappointed that's all he gotWell Taco Charlton from the Dallas cowboys got a sponsorship from a restaurant called Taco Bueno. Different sport but.....money is money.
Serious question. It seems like every prospect the on the Barracuda has a decent shot at an NHL future. Is this just the bias talking?
Serious question. It seems like every prospect the on the Barracuda has a decent shot at an NHL future. Is this just the bias talking?
I'm a little more optimistic on Chartier than you are so I'd move him up a tier but after that, I can't really disagree with you. I'd maybe include Roy on the list somewhereYou don't have a prospect in the system unless you think there's a reasonable chance they can make something useful of themselves. Some, maybe most, aren't going to make it, but even as a fanbase there's no point in looking at the pool and just assuming that there's going to be 2/3rds or 3/4ths attrition before we see a handful make it.
Reasonably, if I were looking at the pool WRT Cuda guys, I would probably say that it could break down like this:
Will make it
I don't have the confidence to say we have any 'sure things' at the moment.
Should make it
Balcers
Bibeau
Gambrell
Suomela
Could make it (or too soon to tell)
Blichfeld
DeSimone
Gregor
Halbgewachs
Letunov
Kornar
Middleton
Praplan
True
Probably won't make it
Chartier
Fitzgerald
Wiederer
Wood
Almost certainly won't make it
Brodzinski
Martin
Sandberg
Schoenborn
Note that I'm not including the aged-out guys (Simek, Radil, Clifton, Heed)
I'm a little more optimistic on Chartier than you are so I'd move him up a tier but after that, I can't really disagree with you. I'd maybe include Roy on the list somewhere
Serious question. It seems like every prospect the on the Barracuda has a decent shot at an NHL future. Is this just the bias talking?
I'm a little more optimistic on Chartier than you are so I'd move him up a tier but after that, I can't really disagree with you. I'd maybe include Roy on the list somewhere
Do Chmelevski and Chekhovich meet the criteria for being on the list? Because if so, I would have them in that “could make it” list for sure.
You don't have a prospect in the system unless you think there's a reasonable chance they can make something useful of themselves. Some, maybe most, aren't going to make it, but even as a fanbase there's no point in looking at the pool and just assuming that there's going to be 2/3rds or 3/4ths attrition before we see a handful make it.
Reasonably, if I were looking at the pool WRT Cuda guys, I would probably say that it could break down like this:
Will make it
I don't have the confidence to say we have any 'sure things' at the moment.
Should make it
Balcers
Bibeau
Gambrell
Suomela
Could make it (or too soon to tell)
Blichfeld
DeSimone
Gregor
Halbgewachs
Letunov
Kornar
Middleton
Praplan
True
Probably won't make it
Chartier
Fitzgerald
Wiederer
Wood
Almost certainly won't make it
Brodzinski
Martin
Sandberg
Schoenborn
Note that I'm not including the aged-out guys (Simek, Radil, Clifton, Heed)
I completely forgot about Roy.
He probably slots in "probably won't make it" unless he comes back this season and shows that he has miracle knees that aren't going to make him move like a geriatric wading through a kiddy pool full of pudding.
Re: Chartier - The farther we get from it, the more his super breakout season with the Rockets looks like a high water mark. Yes he was basically a PPG guy last year, but that was playing essentially a quarter of a season. In 4 WHL seasons and 2 pro seasons he's only managed to stay healthy the whole year basically twice.
I was only concerned with guys who are currently or are expected to be on the Cuda this season. That meant no CHLers (Chmelevski, Checkhovich, Merkley, etc), no NCAA guys (Ferraro, Norris, etc), and nobody still in Europe (Karlsson, and... well pretty much just Karlsson at this point.)
Re: the pool, it's a deep pool, but not one deep in high end talent.
Reasonably, any forwards in the the "should" and "could" tiers have middle 6 potential except for True. No gamebreakers, no leading scorer types, but the type of guy who has enough offensive zing to be maybe a 15-20 goal, 35-55 point forward. Someone on the Donskoi/Labanc tier of talent. Obviously you can't make a whole team out of guys like that, but for all the talk about needing boom-or-bust, Merkley-esque prospects, there's something to be said for having enough reasonable contributors in the system to have a pretty good chance of turning out enough of them to staff 2 or maybe even 3 lines with players of that talent level. And even if a bunch of them can't crack the 2nd line barrier, it's even a boon just to get a bunch of good 3rd liners to sift through.
Thanks for that and analysis. I do think that while teams almost always draft looking for NHL talent, they'll sign prospects intending then to be AHL players...especially undrafted players like True. Of course, there are players like Sandberg whose stock has dropped a lot.
But, it seems like many prospects are at least putting up numbers that typically translate into moderate NHL success.
Great post and I mostly agree, but I think LaBanc has a higher ceiling than what we’ve seen, and I think his ceiling is higher than any of our other prospects besides Merkley.
Also, is it confirmed that Chmelevski and Chekhovich are going back to junior? I assumed both did well enough with the Cuda last year to earn a full-time spot with them this year. Perhaps their contracts are AHL or NHL only?
Great post and I mostly agree, but I think LaBanc has a higher ceiling than what we’ve seen, and I think his ceiling is higher than any of our other prospects besides Merkley.
Also, is it confirmed that Chmelevski and Chekhovich are going back to junior? I assumed both did well enough with the Cuda last year to earn a full-time spot with them this year. Perhaps their contracts are AHL or NHL only?
Chmelevski and Chekhovich are too young for the AHL, so it's NHL or Juniors for them. Once their junior seasons are over they can join the Barracuda indefinitely.Great post and I mostly agree, but I think LaBanc has a higher ceiling than what we’ve seen, and I think his ceiling is higher than any of our other prospects besides Merkley.
Also, is it confirmed that Chmelevski and Chekhovich are going back to junior? I assumed both did well enough with the Cuda last year to earn a full-time spot with them this year. Perhaps their contracts are AHL or NHL only?