Filthy Dangles
Registered User*
- Oct 23, 2014
- 28,673
- 40,326
Tuch's rel on ice numbers only look bad because the team as a whole made a big jump in corsi tbh. Last year they were 10th at 51%. This year they're 3rd at 54.5. Tuch's flat corsi is actually 1% higher than last season at 53%.tuch is interesting. last year 2nd line scoring and very good on ice numbers, but this year mid to high end 1st line scoring with bad on ice numbers. moving forward i expect something in between, unless he simply keeps improving which at his age would not surprise me one bit.
hes 52.2% xgf% and -3.8 rel this season. last year he was 53.1% xgf% and +2.6 rel.Tuch's rel on ice numbers only look bad because the team as a whole made a big jump in corsi tbh. Last year they were 10th at 51%. This year they're 3rd at 54.5. Tuch's flat corsi is actually 1% higher than last season at 53%.
Yeah, his QoC stats have gone up as a result of spending more time against opposing top 2 lines, so a little lower xgf% is expected- and the team's fenwick has gone up a lot as a whole, which positively affects the team's xgf%, which is why his rel numbers there also aren't as good.hes 52.2% xgf% and -3.8 rel this season. last year he was 53.1% xgf% and +2.6 rel.
Granlund, as much as I like Tuch as a solid top-6 wing Granlund is clearly better. Considering how much this site loves Finns im surprised Granlund is down 4-2 so far including my Granlund vote.
i really dont hate finnsConsidering how much you hate finns I am surprised you voted for one. Woo
i really dont hate finns
Just Mikkoi really dont hate finns
i really dont hate finns lol idk why you think thatSure buddy. Maybe it will change once you become an adult
i dont hate him i just think hes overratedJust Mikko
With zero reasoni really dont hate finns lol idk why you think that
i dont hate him i just think hes overrated
ive given my reasons actually. not gonna derail this thread but you can find my postsWith zero reason
I've heard your reasons, they're garbageive given my reasons actually. not gonna derail this thread but you can find my posts
Yeah, his QoC stats have gone up as a result of spending more time against opposing top 2 lines, so a little lower xgf% is expected- and the team's fenwick has gone up a lot as a whole, which positively affects the team's xgf%, which is why his rel numbers there also aren't as good.
Team xgf% made a giant jump from 50.67 in 2017-18 to 55.56 this season.
yeah but with raw stats they can be dragged down by teammates. theres a reason i generally use both. to me a 48% +2 rel guy is comparable to a 50% 0 rel guy or a 52% -2 rel guy.Yea, as usual the problem with relative stats are that they're supposed to level the playing field between players on good and bad teams, but often just ends up showing whether the players you don't play with are playing well or not
yeah but with raw stats they can be dragged down by teammates. theres a reason i generally use both. to me a 48% +2 rel guy is comparable to a 50% 0 rel guy or a 52% -2 rel guy.
yeah. i tend to look at which line combos perform well usually. like, adam erne has great on ice numbers but he seems to only be a slight on-ice plus on the 4th line compared to most of the guys hes subbed in and out for. his numbers are carried by his time with cirelli and killorn.Yea, I think using both is important, plus the context of why, such as whether there's a particularly good or bad line that plays big minutes