bernmeister
Registered User
The following
Which New York Rangers Key Free Agents Stay And Go
First, it postulates we keep Tara.
No.
I like Tara, but we can't afford him unless he is willing to lower himself to roughly min $ for 1 yr.
He might take a cut but he won't go that low (1m-ish), so no.
Second, it correctly assesses we need to keep KAM but there is a disconnect between that statement and the required follow thru.
Bridging KAM is not smart, it needlessly creates long term cap probs.
We MUST extend.
6.25 x 8, bern calls it.
No nmc, extensive ntc which reduces over life of the contract.
But how can we EXTEND kam if we are paying Tara?
Third, LaF gets traded.
Yes in theory, no in practice.
IF there is enuf on the table, yes. We do not want to make the mistake Slats made where he had Talbot + for 9OA from SJ but turned it down and painted himself into a corner.
Howev, as a precursor to getting best return back, it behooves us to
-- promote entire kid line to 2nd line only a few mins less than 1st line
-- give rfa LaF a bridge deal which he takes to bet on himself
**************************
dealing youth for vets
dealing the future of LaF from less than a position of full strength
for
the ability to have instant gratification of adding Tara immediately
IS ANOTHER STUPID, IDIOTIC WIN NOW MOVE
that track record shows only comes back to bite us in the ass later.
whoever is responsible for the unsubstantiated clickbait, be ashamed.
may the stupidity of this article bend buckle and break before bern's better bites
rant over
comments welcome
peace out
Which New York Rangers Key Free Agents Stay And Go
First, it postulates we keep Tara.
No.
I like Tara, but we can't afford him unless he is willing to lower himself to roughly min $ for 1 yr.
He might take a cut but he won't go that low (1m-ish), so no.
Second, it correctly assesses we need to keep KAM but there is a disconnect between that statement and the required follow thru.
Bridging KAM is not smart, it needlessly creates long term cap probs.
We MUST extend.
6.25 x 8, bern calls it.
No nmc, extensive ntc which reduces over life of the contract.
But how can we EXTEND kam if we are paying Tara?
Third, LaF gets traded.
Yes in theory, no in practice.
IF there is enuf on the table, yes. We do not want to make the mistake Slats made where he had Talbot + for 9OA from SJ but turned it down and painted himself into a corner.
Howev, as a precursor to getting best return back, it behooves us to
-- promote entire kid line to 2nd line only a few mins less than 1st line
-- give rfa LaF a bridge deal which he takes to bet on himself
**************************
dealing youth for vets
dealing the future of LaF from less than a position of full strength
for
the ability to have instant gratification of adding Tara immediately
IS ANOTHER STUPID, IDIOTIC WIN NOW MOVE
that track record shows only comes back to bite us in the ass later.
whoever is responsible for the unsubstantiated clickbait, be ashamed.
may the stupidity of this article bend buckle and break before bern's better bites
rant over
comments welcome
peace out
