Rum River Renegades
Coach:
Terry Crisp
Shawn Mceachern-
Don Raleigh-
Blaine Stoughton
Jeff Friesen-
Michal Pivonka-
Earl Robinson
Andre Pronovost-
Larry Patey-
Lucien Deblois
Jim Riley-
Mike Bullard-
Scott Young
Ted Graham-
Doug Lidster
Chris Phillips-Paul Martin
Hy Buller-
Uwe Krupp
Bill Ranford
Jim Henry
Bench: Cecil Blachford, Johnny Sheppard, Kyle Mclaren, Tobias Enstrom
Special teams:
PP 1: Mceachern-Raleigh-Stoughton-Lidster-Martin
PP 2: Friesen-Bullard-Robinson-Buller-Graham
PK 1: Pronovost-Patey-Graham-Phillips
PK 2: Pivonka-Deblois-Krupp-Martin
Leadership: Doug Lidster (Captains), Chris Phillips (Alternate), Michal Pivonka (Alternate)
Crisp is an OK AAA coach. This draft is actually full of those. No one jumped right out at me. Even my own coach, I thought he had the best credentials but he didn't overwhelm me. We did a
really good job grabbing the best guys in the MLD so no one looks like a steal or particularly weak.
As for your captains and assistants: why Lidster? Phillips wore a letter in Ottawa for years, so that I can see. Most pictures of Pivonka don't show him wearing a letter at all. I know they captained crappy teams, but McEachern and DeBlois are your most accomplished leaders, having led NHL squads for two years apiece. You should have DeBlois as a captain, with McEachern and Phillips as the assistants. Still, the leadership group on this team is not great.
Raleigh is nothing special as an AAA center, at least not in this group of players (a few years ago in a draft that went deeper than picks 1000-1150 he looked outstanding). Stoughton is just about as good as it gets for offensive wingers at this point. McEachern is a little hit and miss as a first line glue guy. He's OK offensively, good enough to hold his own, and OK defensively, maybe not enough to carry the load, but reasonable. However, physically, he was weak. Despite his enthusiasm the scouting reports annually reported his frequent losing of puck battles. That's not a "puckwinner", though his willingness to backcheck will come in handy.
Pivonka is a decent 2nd line center. When you selected him there were a good dozen left with better offensive numbers, but he does bring a little bit of a defensive game. It's a risky game bringing a player into a scoring line role in an all-time setting when they spent so long as the second wheel to a clearly superior offensive player. His point collaboration score isn't great, not Chris Kunitz territory, but it does show he had a ton of help putting up the points he did. Robinson is like Stoughton, pretty much an offensive ringer. A few years back he looked stellar at the AAA level, but again we were far deeper in at that point. He's merely OK in this draft. Friesen I thought was picked a bit early, but now I'm not so sure. He was competitive and gritty, fairly responsible defensively and scored a pretty decent amount for the era. He won't punish anyone but he will be an effective worker bee for this line.
Pronovost is a guy I still find it hard to get a read on. Honestly, he's never even close to the top of my list for a checking winger when he gets selected. He isn't my classic "two way" kind of guy with a decent offensive game, and I don't like how little his defensive game is substantiated currently. There's basically one great quote and then little bits here and there about how he was a checking line player. Also, he wilted outside of Montreal. Patey is one of the best pure defensive players in this draft, probably top-3. DeBlois is a great jack-of-all-trades but he's probably not as established defensively for a third line spot in this more competitive AAA draft. And that's from the guy who literally wrote the book on DeBlois (see last year's bio).
Riley is best suited as a spare... actually, probably should have been a dropper. His offensive numbers are very weak, weaker when you consider who he played with. He has little else to his game that's substantiated, aside from the ability to occasionally drop back to the blueline, which is why I say he might be a better spare than starter. Bullard was one of the finest scorers available when you took him, but he did little else than score and looks useless in a 4th line role. Young is an OK speedster and triggerman who could be a decent finisher in the AA draft on a scoring line, or the third man on a solid 3rd/4th line in this draft. But in this case he's your most solid two-way player on the line, and that's a problem. Another problem - this might literally be the most goals-biased line I have ever seen in one of these things.
Suggestion - switch Bullard and Pivonka. Bullard is undoubtedly the superior offensive player, and Pivonka is a little more suited to 4th line duty. It makes better use of their strengths, and the pure playmaking Pivonka really balances out that 4th line better. And the 2nd line, for that matter, since Friesen is more of a playmaker than Young, and Robinson had more assists than goals in an era where most wingers did not.
Lidster is exactly the type of minute munching player you should want manning a top unit in the AAA draft. He played 22 minutes for 900 games, and had seven seasons where he was either named his team's best defenseman or was 1/1a in icetime for a top-6 defensive team. Not too shabby. Graham is a really solid complement to the softish Lidster, too.
Phillips/Martin is just about a perfect 2nd pairing too. I might get in trouble saying this, because there are just 6 teams and room for just 12 top unit defensemen, but I think they are both potentially top pairing defensemen here. I've always said Martin was the perfect partner for Marsh as they complement eachother so perfectly, and Phillips is a good substitute for Marsh in that equation. I'd have grabbed Martin but he's a really weak PP option and I wanted to make sure I had four OK guys for that role.
Buller reads as pretty much a specialist at this level which is OK, we all need one. Krupp is a puzzling partner for him though. You could call the guy a poor man's Kubina, he had all the tools but couldn't translate that into being an excellent defensive player (he was merely OK). And I think what you want next to a specialist is an excellent defensive player as a safety valve, right?
I don't know what to make of Ranford. In recent years he wasn't anywhere near the top of my list when selected by other GMs. He had two very bright flashes of success in the spring of 1990 and the summer of 1991, and those were actually two of his three seasons where he had an above average sv% (the other was 1988 with Boston) but other than that his NHL stats were terrible, he was never above the league average again and looking back I can't tell if he was always getting shell shocked or was he just dining out on past success for too long? I think it was both. I mean, it's not impossible to put up strong save percentage stats on weak and/or run and gun teams at least a few times, even for goalies at this level. Meloche, Potvin, Khabibulin... they all did it. Plus late MLD picks Burke and Hrudey. On the other hand, 1990 and 1991 did happen. He seems like a lesser version of Barrasso/Vernon/Richter/Giguere, guys who do well in "accomplishment counting" but taking a wider look at their career and their average, day-to-day performance is far less flattering. Would I play Jim Henry above Ranford? Yes, personally, I would.
Spares are good. I especially like Blachford there. Sheppard is a fairly versatile player who isn't especially
great on any line at this level but can fill in. McLaren is at least better than Leschyshyn. Enstrom was a bit of a surprise. I don't think he's quite an AAA player. Decent fill-in for Buller though.
on the PP, if your goal is loading up the line as much as possible I'd swap Bullard with Raleigh. And Buller absolutely needs to be on the first PP unit; otherwise, why even have him? There's also the fact that he's clearly your best offensive blueliner. Lidster will have to stay up there - he's not a great PP player but he is the second best you've got.
On the second unit you're probably stuck with Martin and Graham. Both are awful PP options but it's too late to do anything about that. They're going to be effective even strength players for you so you should happily live with the weak 2nd PP unit. Actually, why not at least Krupp over Graham? Seems like a no-brainer there. Graham is a career 38 point scorer, Krupp at least had 37+ three times, and 95 career PP points.
On the PK, I definitely agree Patey needs to be on your top unit. Pronovost
might be the best bet for a partner for him, though we can't be sure how much he actually killed penalties. One shorthanded point in his entire career doesn't bode well, though. on the 2nd unit, Deblois is the next most experienced guy you have, so I agree he should be there, but Pivonka didn't kill a great number of penalties - Scott Young is actually more experienced in that area. You might want to swap them, since DeBlois can play center. For defensemen, I like the two rocks on the first unit, and Martin's stats are so excellent he has to be on the 2nd. You might want to consider Lidster over Krupp though; I think he's got the better defensive reputation. However, putting a third pairing guy on two special teams is nice too because you can really rest those top guys. if you take my advice and put Krupp on the PP, then you have only Martin and Krupp playing two special teams, and both are 2nd unit.
Overall? I can't really say. I haven't sorted out these six teams yet. I think you have an adequate coach, decently built top-6 with underwhelming centers, a really weird 4th line, outstanding top-4 on defense, and special teams need some work but there's time to fix that.