1) uh..
So that’s what I got, what about you?
Hockey is the best sport in the world and the talent has never been better, so of course I still love watching games. But I just wonder what exactly does the league itself do that you think is good.
Reffing, scheduling, rules, the website, DoPS, I have problems with all these things. None of them are good. So can anyone think of anything the league does well except increase franchise values? I know, literally execs’ jobs, but I’d say improving the actual product might help in that aim. Thoughts?
Honestly, you North Americans are spoiled, I swear...
How many times have you ever watched a different professional league than the NHL?
-The Jerseys. NHL jerseys are classy and until recently entirely ad free. Have you seen some European jerseys? And have you seen some of the rinks? I know it's changing in the NHL, but sometimes you can't even find the name on the back of the jersey in some European leagues amongst all the advertisements.
-Parity. I know there are a lot of complaints about this, but have you tried watching European soccer where 1-4 teams have an actual shot at winning the league and the rest are vying for other spots in tournaments or just not getting relegated. It's real nice to see teams go through cycles where they are bad, then good, then bad again, or have surprisingly good seasons when expectations are low (like Vancouver or the Jets this year). There's much more excitement heading into every season instead of say, the Bundesliga where it's just a countdown to see when Bayern wins. Parity creates storylines, which creates engagement and excitement.
-Salary cap. I think hockey fans would get real tired, real quick if the Leafs, Rangers, Blackhawks, Habs were always in the playoffs because they could outbuy all the other teams. There would be more Arizonas (no offense) out there that would just become farm teams for the big contenders and the whole league would get lop-sided and boring. A facet I (and plenty of other Europeans I talk to) love about the NHL and some NA sports is the added game within a game of the salary cap. Teams can't just buy championships à la Manchester City or Paris Saint-Germain.
-The draft. Just drafting players and not having players developed through youth associates to teams really creates a dynamic. I know a lot of North Americans just assume this is the status quo, but in other countries and in other sports this isn't necessarily the case. It's fun seeing talent spread around and rewarding to see teams who do their homework on kids, draft well, and develop well create good teams. Just having academies would probably over enrich some of the big Canadian teams and create a lop-sided league that isn't as competitive and thus less fun to watch.
-European players. Honestly, this is where North Americans are the worst. NHL teams basically steal good European players for free without any compensation for the club or countries that develop them. How much better would the SHL be with EP40, Zibinejad, Nylander, Karlsson, Dahlin, etc.? That the NHL has managed to avoid any sort of transfer fees to these clubs must save the NHL tons of money. It basically creates a system where the world feeds the NHL players and the NHL doesn't have to compensate anyone for that -- which is a huge coup. And annoyingly there is this sense of entitlement from NA fans, where overseas teams "ruin" "their" prospects by not giving them top line minutes right away, not catering just to them and that the needs and wants of the team that has scouted, developed and managed the players up until then don't matter and should be sidelined in place of an NHL prospect. This might sound like complaining from me, but honestly here the NHL has just outplayed everybody and has found itself a golden goose and has done well to do so. And then they do one better by engaging the European community by broadcasting the early games in NA at good viewing times for us here in Europe in order to showcase European stars, so that we now follow the NHL and not just our local leagues, thereby increasing the NHL's reach.
-Professionalism. The broadcasts are done really well. The announcers for the most part of all quite good, they have done their homework before hand, have good insights into the game, the camerawork is excellent with almost nothing being missed, the coaching staff is always well dressed and not in workout attire like Bill Bellichek or some EPL managers. Sometimes instead of the NA feed, we'll get Norwegian commentators here in Norway for Saturday or Sunday games and it's horrible. It's kind of like a GDT here but verbal. Even the worst of the worst from the US like Boston or Colorado are better than them.
I could go on, but the NHL does plenty right and acting like it doesn't do anything well is just childish. NA fans are spoiled and don't know what they have. It's like being in high school and you're gifted a Porsche and you spend all your time complaining about it not being a Ferrari, meanwhile here in Norway we're biking to our part-time job at McDonalds trying to save up to buy our uncle's 20 year old Skoda.